Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our dual tight end threat.


Dex

Recommended Posts

This really seems to be one of the main reasons why we are giving defensive coordinators fits. The subject of resigning Shockey has come up in a few topics on here but what do you think the chances are of Shockey resigning with us for a 2-3 year deal? They seem to be perfect for this offense. They're like the 2009 tight end version of double trouble. We need a nick name so someone needs to get on that ASAP. I'm loving this dual threat.

Shock & Awwlsen

Run White Boys Run

The Knights of Cam-e-lot.

The Golden Boys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick names suck.

Tightends do pose matchup problems.

This offense is loaded with weapons.

Two elite running backs.

One of the best receivers in the league.

Two dangerous tight ends.

(Damn i miss gettis)

The defense can't shut them all down.

All the qb has to do is get the ball into the hands of his playmakers.

Our tightends havent had the success i have been expecting, but that's cause te attention they've been getting from defenses, especially in the redzone.

Once Cam eliminates his mistakes, and continues to gel with his weapons, this offense will be even more dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...