Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Reason Drew Brees had so much Success


Matthias

Recommended Posts

There was no bump and run coverage with our secondary. The saints receivers had free release all day, and Brees was in perfect rhythm. If the guys just got in the receivers face just once today, Brees would have had to adjust, giving more time for CJ or Hardy to get to him.

I am utterly disgusted Rivera didn't make that adjustment all game, especially on that last drive.:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Setfree1012

They spoke about this DURING the game, they didn't go man because of the match-up issues they'd face with Graham and Sproles 1v1. Zones were the best option given the match-ups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, we should have at least knock these receivers timing off a little bit. No way will we beat an elite QB with a zone scheme. (The most we could hope for is him overthrowing a guy and picking it off, like we did with Sherrod) I think we could have handled Sproiles with our fastest linebacker on him etc. We could have made it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, we should have at least knock these receivers timing off a little bit. No way will we beat an elite QB with a zone scheme. (The most we could hope for is him overthrowing a guy and picking it off, like we did with Sherrod) I think we could have handled Sproiles with our fastest linebacker on him etc. We could have made it work.

Good luck. Sproles is what Reggie Bush wishes he was.

LB's don't match up, he's too quick, and understands that passing game too well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck. Sproles is what Reggie Bush wishes he was.

LB's don't match up, he's too quick, and understands that passing game too well.

Sproles wasn't nearly as effective as I was afraid he would be. We need guys that can wrap up constantly with this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sproles wasn't nearly as effective as I was afraid he would be. We need guys that can wrap up constantly with this guy.

He was absolutely effective. We had to have certain personnel on the field when he was in there, limiting us in other areas.

It's like that with any playmaker. You can take most any of them away, but at what expense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Setfree1012

The DB's fyi were re-routing the receivers in the passing game, take a look at the stats http://www.panthers.com/schedule/game/2011/regular5/ we bottled the receivers up really well conisdering how explosive they are.

To me a lot of the cover issues were against the TE obviously, at 6'6" and being a former basketball player he was a matchu-up nightmare for the S's, and LB's (Godfrey did well, outside of that crazy catch on the deflection). But with two good coverage LB's in Beason and Davis on IR I see how that became IMO one of the determining factors in the loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zone was only option as mentioned by others. Our backfield and pass rush will get better.

Our zone coverage will get better too. Lots of guys in no man's land yesterday looking a bit confused.

his success was because he was not on his back. if he's not on his back he is gonna make a good play. It's not because he is a genius, he just has the reps and the time back there to trust the experience he gained from those reps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could have still bumped in zone coverage if our corners were patrolling the flats. Just get off the man once somebody comes in the flats. However, everybody in this thread is right, you mainly play bump-and-run in man coverage, and we don't have personnel to do so against the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zone was only option as mentioned by others. Our backfield and pass rush will get better.

Our zone coverage will get better too. Lots of guys in no man's land yesterday looking a bit confused.

his success was because he was not on his back. if he's not on his back he is gonna make a good play. It's not because he is a genius, he just has the reps and the time back there to trust the experience he gained from those reps.

Look at when we did get pressure on Brees. A couple sacks and a couple bad throws. You get to him and he gets panicky. He is so used to being able to sit back all day that he freaks out if he has no escape valve readily available.

Our guy, on the other hand, throws 60 yard bombs in the face of pressure. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • What worries me about Florida, is 2 things 1)Rod doesn't have a good track record against his former coaches in the playoffs 2)alot of our core group, Svech,Aho,Slavin,Jordan etc was apart of that sweep 2 years ago, will that motivate them, or have the opposite effect, make them overthink and beat them before they even take the ice  Toronto won't be pushovers, but they will be a clean slate, with no baggage  
    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
×
×
  • Create New...