Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reset Swag and pie?


Zod

Recommended Posts

if you remove swag, you might as well just ban teeray so we don't have to put up with him posting a million times a day to get it back again! ;)

I don't honestly care... I'd rather it just get removed.

*sigh* time for wall of text posts, funny gifs, and boob pics again.

SWAG is a barometer of my self worth. If you take it away, whatever happens to me is on you Zod!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you realize how many times you'd have to write "no homo" after such things like.... "Hey Grits, thanks for the sperm on my last post"...or "Zod, I spermed you by accident"..

it doesn't sound too good...just trying to look out for you

That alone is a good enough reason to change it. :lol:

Then instead of rep whores, it's Sperm Whales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just go over there. I promise you won't last. You can't win over there. Here, it's easy. There you will get beat. Personal guarantee. They are nearing their 300,000th member actually. If you were to get that, you'd have a hell of a "troll in".

How does one "get beat" on the internet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...