Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Crappiest part about talking about the draft this year...


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

why is no one talking about a corner with our 1st pick? gamble isn't gonna be a borderline good #1 for too much longer and we cant expect captain to be a #2 for his career. he may be one of the best nickel backs in the league, #2....no. (and yes, i do know what a good game he had last week). every mock draft so far has us taking a corner (claiborne from LSU most likely). and honestly, im ok with that pick

because the defensive line sucks a lot worse than the secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really doubt Trent Richardson is going top ten.

If we can't get Blackmon or Alshon, we should just go with BPA on defense. Which would be Morris Claiborne, Brandon Thompson, Dre Kirkpatrick, or Zack Brown. Leaving out Vontaze Burflict since he's a thug and DEs since we clearly don't need one. Not that there's any DEs worth taking that high besides Coples who will likely be gone.

You might want to watch alittle more game film. Richardson is a rare talent with a nice blend of power and speed. If he wins the hiesman this year look out. He is the best back to come out of the draft in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad there is not a monster DT in this years draft. That would solidify everything but OT/OG/Jack LB/CB could all work. Or depending on how everything shakes out we could trade down and pick up some more picks for the next year.

not sure Suh was regarded as a monster by NFL fans at this point in his last season in college......

there are a lot of college players out there....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might want to watch alittle more game film. Richardson is a rare talent with a nice blend of power and speed. If he wins the hiesman this year look out. He is the best back to come out of the draft in years.

No one is going to take a RB in the top ten anymore unless they're a once in a generation talent like AP. Richardson is not getting AP hype and Andrew Luck has had the Heisman on lockdown since the season began. This draft has too much QB, WR, and OL talent to let a RB be taken in the top ten. I mean, there were like six teams whose leading rusher was a UDFA...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love for the coaching staff to make a effort in improving the return game. How about we draft a guy whose sole focus is to return kicks? A real speed demon..We've got some guys with decent speed but no one on our team has elite speed. when i say elite i dont mean 4.39, i mean jacoby ford chris johnson 4.2 speed. Intresting prospect this year i'd look at in the late round would be chris rainey. World class speed who is fast enuff if a NFL career doesn't work out he could be looking at the olympic team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is going to take a RB in the top ten anymore unless they're a once in a generation talent like AP. Richardson is not getting AP hype and Andrew Luck has had the Heisman on lockdown since the season began. This draft has too much QB, WR, and OL talent to let a RB be taken in the top ten. I mean, there were like six teams whose leading rusher was a UDFA...

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/mock

Rob Rang has Richardson going 7th right now to the seahawks. RBs still can go top ten if there special enuff. The reason being we haven't seen any really special talents come out in a few years. Richardson has been touted as being better than ingram even when he won the hiesman.

RB Trent Richardson, 5-11, 224, junior

As good as Andrew Luck has been for Stanford, no player in college football is more physically dominant than Richardson. In terms of size, speed and power, he has more natural ability than former teammate and 2009 Heisman Trophy winner Mark Ingram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...