Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was it right to go with Felton over Fiammetta?


R0CKnR0LLA

Recommended Posts

I thought this was interesting.

Fiammetta, who was claimed off waivers from the Carolina Panthers in September, has played a key role in the recent success of the Cowboys' running game. He does not have any rushing yards this season, but Fiammetta has been a force as a lead blocker, prompting owner/general manager Jerry Jones to call him the franchise's best true fullback since Daryl "Moose" Johnston.

In the six games Fiammetta has played this season, the Cowboys have averaged 145.8 rushing yards and 6.6 yards per carry. They averaged 84.6 rushing yards and 2.5 per carry in the three games Fiammetta did not play. The vast majority of rookie Murray's franchise-record 601 yards in the past four games have occurred with the 6-foot, 242-pound Fiammetta on the field.

http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7250648/dallas-cowboys-fb-tony-fiammetta-illness-vs-washington-redskins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting, but I would be hard-pressed to beleive he suddenly became good. He wasn't that great for us. The cowboys rushing scheme is better than ours (not necessarily production, but scheme). DeMarco Murray is the reason for this stats, not Fiametta (credit by association).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we gave up a little too quickly on Fiametta. Those who say he couldn't find an identity in the wake of the Hoover cut under Fox are correct. He could never establish himself. And in the post-Fox era, Rivera and Co. liked Felton. I like Felton, too. Fia in a different system is a better fit. So be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...