Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giving our defense excuses


Peppermint9030

Recommended Posts

should lead to you being banned...I've heard "were not bad we just play a good 30 minutes on defense", "We just don't have much depth"...Depth? We don't have talent! One decent LB, one good CB, and a solid DE...That is it the rest of the defense can be scraped...Hardy your a rotation guy at best...Our DT's BLOW, our Line Backers BLOW, our secondary BLOW'S, our scheme BLOW'S...Overreacting? NO, look at the talent around the league! Our starters may not crack other teams "depth"... One thing that makes this hard for me is Fox has Denver winning by holding opponents under 13 a game, they were 28th in D last season...Our defense has drastically dropped from last year...The type of fall that the offense would take if you put Jimmy in for Cam...Drastic, scrapped, it looks horrible, it is horrible...If it walk's like a fuging duck, and talk's like a fuging duck then guess what people it's usually a fuging DUCK! We can't stop the run, can't tackle worth a poo, and can't cover besides Gamble, and we don't have a consistent pass rush...Well I guess that mean's our defense blows...Sugar coat that every one I'm waiting for it...I thought Rivera was a defensive guy? No one thought the D would drop this bad...And don't hand me that "well wait till next off season" poo we wasted two early picks on the DT's of the "future"...Does that show you a little something...fug without Cam we have the worst draft in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have a decent amount of talent, but a lot of it is young. I really think a large part of our problem is depth... we just can't stay with it for the full game. That's because many of the guys we are starting are typically rotation players who would be coming off the bench to keep our starters healthy, but with injuries to LBers and to our starting DT, we're playing a lot of youth and rotation guys, and we're wearing them out. It's not that we're great on first string and horrible after, it's that I think we are actually relatively average when fresh but terrrrible in depth because our average first string is supposed to be our depth.

As to this defense not having talent, when it's healthy it has plenty of talent. Even right now, we have one great DE, one good DE, a good LB, a good CB, one good safety and one average safety. We also have promising youth at nickle back (being forced to start at 2nd CB because our FO piss me off curse curse) and DT (well, mcclain anyway, though Rivera actually thought fua was better this last game and mcclain was a bit worse).

It's way more complicated than "we don't have talent." It's fair to say we don't have healthy, experienced talent, because we are playing backups and a fair number of young guys, but I think that if we make smart FA moves and draft well we could very quickly build this defense up.

But we will need to make FA moves I think, and I'm not sure that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

should lead to you being banned...I've heard "were not bad we just play a good 30 minutes on defense", "We just don't have much depth"...Depth? We don't have talent! One decent LB, one good CB, and a solid DE...That is it the rest of the defense can be scraped...Hardy your a rotation guy at best...Our DT's BLOW, our Line Backers BLOW, our secondary BLOW'S, our scheme BLOW'S...Overreacting? NO, look at the talent around the league! Our starters may not crack other teams "depth"... One thing that makes this hard for me is Fox has Denver winning by holding opponents under 13 a game, they were 28th in D last season...Our defense has drastically dropped from last year...The type of fall that the offense would take if you put Jimmy in for Cam...Drastic, scrapped, it looks horrible, it is horrible...If it walk's like a fuging duck, and talk's like a fuging duck then guess what people it's usually a fuging DUCK! We can't stop the run, can't tackle worth a poo, and can't cover besides Gamble, and we don't have a consistent pass rush...Well I guess that mean's our defense blows...Sugar coat that every one I'm waiting for it...I thought Rivera was a defensive guy? No one thought the D would drop this bad...And don't hand me that "well wait till next off season" poo we wasted two early picks on the DT's of the "future"...Does that show you a little something...fug without Cam we have the worst draft in the NFL.

You really need to relax man or those arteries in your head are going to BLOW. :sifone:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, I knew our defense would be bad when Beason, Davis, and Edwards went down. We weren't any better than average last year, and losing players of that caliber take you from average to below average. Injuries are not an excuse, but they are definitely a reason. And before anyone brings up Green Bay from last year, there are a handful of times in NFL history that a team has suffered that many key injuries and still been able to finish with a championship season. Most of the time, teams suffering through multiple key injuries end up not being very good. The few that do go on and keep winning are usually teams that get lucky in the depth department.

That being said, I am not sold on Mcdermott either and wasn't sure about the hire when we hired him. But I certainly ain't gonna judge him or any other coach (win or lose) on 8 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind the scheme but we clearly have issues. We're clearly playing players who wouldn't be playing on good teams. Definitely not a recipe for success but we do have some good players( DE's,Gamble), a couple of them out (Beason and TD), and some decent ones (Godfrey,Andersen, Connor). We really need a ballhawk FS, and another corner with some skills and size opposite of Gamble ( I like Butler, but he's still proving himself), and we need some power in the middle of our DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not read that because it was too long but I will say most of our defense is undrafted free agent practice squad bums. Or guys with that kind of talent. That is a fact. Your defense is not going to be good when that is the case. There is a lot of personnel moves that will have to be made on that side of the ball before our defense is good. Hopefully the right moves will be made and we will be a top defense like we were forever ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our safeties are divas who pray they don't have to tackle and our DTs are inexperienced marshmallows.

Healthy or not, Beason and Davis couldn't even save this D. A ball hawking safety and a stud DT would do wonders for covering some of our lack of skill/depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...