Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton leads league in screen passes


savage

Recommended Posts

interesting stat. i noticed we were implementing way more screens than i've ever seen of this team and its been very effective so far.

"People think of Newton as having a big arm, and he does, but he leads the league with 41 completed screens for a league-high 355 yards."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those dumpoff passes to Jonathan are so effective. He needs to be our every down guy, he's a better runner, better blocker, and a better pass-catcher.

We need to split carries between our backs so they can have a longer career.

I agree but I think Deangelo is still a good RB he just hasn't got the carries like he used to get with Fox.

I am very disappointed to see that we wont have a 1,000 yard RB this season, I really think that Chud needs to run the ball more often especially when we are ahead, our RBs have great YPC averages so why not run and keep the pressure off of Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to split carries between our backs so they can have a longer career.

I agree but I think Deangelo is still a good RB he just hasn't got the carries like he used to get with Fox.

I am very disappointed to see that we wont have a 1,000 yard RB this season, I really think that Chud needs to run the ball more often especially when we are ahead, our RBs have great YPC averages so why not run and keep the pressure off of Cam.

We have been running, the carries have just been split so evenly that no Running Back could ever have crazy stats. It's just such a shame to see Jonathan Stewart in the prime of his football career be so underutilized. He has the pedigree of a true elite back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It feels like every week our offense is moving in a positive direction. It took some time for everyone, including Newton and Chud to learn the abilities of this team. This offense is moving toward a vertical passing threat offense, but we still have the pieces of a great power running offense. I think Chud's just using variety to play to our strengths and hide our weaknesses like any good offensive coordinator should do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been running, the carries have just been split so evenly that no Running Back could ever have crazy stats. It's just such a shame to see Jonathan Stewart in the prime of his football career be so underutilized. He has the pedigree of a true elite back.

I agree we are running enough, after all, the three headed monster will likely end up with over 2000 combined rushing yards this year. Earlier in the year there may have been times we could have run more, but we seem to have found our groove now.

However, I disagree with you about Stewart. Sure, he's a great back and is running very well, but runners with his style tend to wear out rather quickly, so I believe this rotation will actually benefit his career. Also, DeAngelo is a great back in his own right, but has a completely different style. And though different, I think their styles compliment one another which makes it very difficult on defenses...then you add in Cam, and they become a devastating threesome that is build to be sustainable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been running, the carries have just been split so evenly that no Running Back could ever have crazy stats. It's just such a shame to see Jonathan Stewart in the prime of his football career be so underutilized. He has the pedigree of a true elite back.

I agree we are running enough, after all, the three headed monster will likely end up with over 2000 combined rushing yards this year. Earlier in the season there may have been times we could have run more, but we seem to have found our groove now.

However, I disagree with you about Stewart. Sure, he's a great back and is running very well, but runners with his style tend to wear out rather quickly, so I believe this rotation will actually benefit his career. Also, DeAngelo is a great back in his own right, but has a completely different style. And though different, I think their styles compliment one another very well which makes it extremely difficult on defenses...then you add in Cam, and they become a devastating threesome that is build to be sustainable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree we are running enough, after all, the three headed monster will likely end up with over 2000 combined rushing yards this year. Earlier in the season there may have been times we could have run more, but we seem to have found our groove now.

However, I disagree with you about Stewart. Sure, he's a great back and is running very well, but runners with his style tend to wear out rather quickly, so I believe this rotation will actually benefit his career. Also, DeAngelo is a great back in his own right, but has a completely different style. And though different, I think their styles compliment one another very well which makes it extremely difficult on defenses...then you add in Cam, and they become a devastating threesome that is build to be sustainable.

Yes, I just don't think it will be sustainable financially. It will be very difficult to pay Jonathan his market value when we gave Deangelo such a large contract. We could have another back filling Deangelo's role while Stewart becomes our primary guy. It would have been much more effective on the dollar with little to any actual dropoff in production. I understand the premise of "paying your players", but not at the expense of losing a guy like Stew who could be truly elite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I along with just about everyone else thinks that we paid deangelo too much, but he is still very dangerous in the open feild. I hope that we run more of our option plays next year. Make the defense swarm to cam when he is running with the ball, then lateral to deangelo with some open feild in front of him... we should be calling these plays every week IMO.

Continue to use Stewart as the primary back between the tackles, but utilize Deangelo on the open feild plays. I really like that formation when both of our backs are on the feild, and the defense has to guess which one is getting the ball. Chud is a freakin genius, I love him.

If you want plays like this, just remember not to complain when Cam gets crushed everytime we run the option whether he keeps the ball or not. Just like Vick used to whine when he would fake having the ball after a handoff and get laid out. If you pretend to have the ball or just got rid of the ball, your fair game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As expected. Still no reason not to bring in competition via FA or draft. Bryce can be our bridge QB until we find ourselves our franchise QB. 
    • I've been here since the forum started.    It's an X through Fitterer because I couldn't stand him.   Very troll like behavior.      
    • I agree with this, wholeheartedly. Bryce tantalizingly has his moments, even his games. This past Saturday was one of those. He really became the Mouse that Roared after the team fell behind and the o-line started collapsing. And, in truth, I think had the play calling been better at the end, he might well have brought us back into another lead change. Talk about a legendary moment just missed. I'm going to get lambasted for this but as a cautionary tale, I want to just say we're sitting at a spot that the San Diego Chargers were way back in the day. They had a short-ish QB on a rebuilding team that was underwhelming most games, but had some really good moments. They decided instead to take a gamble on drafting someone new and letting that QB, Drew Brees, go find someone more willing to let him develop. They turned around and had a draft debacle with Eli Manning/Phillip Rivers, ending up with Rivers in the end. We've got to remember that Brees wasn't who he would become at that time, it would take a coach willing to open up the offense and give the tough young kid a chance to grow. Rivers would become the poster child for the guy who almost was. Brees will get a gold jacket someday to go with the Saints only Superbowl win. Bryce probably isn't Brees, only one guy was and he barely got the chance to be him. Giving Bryce another season, maybe two, on squad gives us the luxury of testing the waters and the growth.  QBs early in their careers take time. We saw Rogers last night at the end of his career (maybe), sputtering out before he heads to the barn for his spot in the HoF and we have to remember him at his best, after sitting on the bench for three years. And we have to look at the other side of that coin last night, CJ Stroud, a draft classmate of Bryce's who soared out of the gates but who has come to earth since. He's still a good QB with a long runway ahead of him, but his performance under the big spotlight wasn't as strong as Bryce's on this particular weekend. I'm not 100 percent sure Bryce will be the guy. I'd like to see some more fire in the young man, some push, something that shows he can force his will on the other team's defense.  I am, however, seeing a kid that can make the throws, who can improvise and who amazingly can run braver and faster than I really thought he could. I think he needs time, he needs more confidence and he needs more brave coaching. If he doesn't get that here, I think he might find it elsewhere. And we'd find ourselves like the Spanos family, sitting on the couch in February asking Phillip Rivers to pass the chips during the Super Bowl commercial breaks year after year.
×
×
  • Create New...