Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adi Kunalic Inactive

Lilsmitty09

By Lilsmitty09,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Guest Irv

Guest Irv

Posted
Posted

Rivera just wants to see if olindo took the competition seriously this week. I agree with this move because if olind'oh shanks one again he's done.

Butler inactive again? What the fug?

butler has a concussion, hogan replaces him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Community Regular

Dex

Posted
Posted

Rivera just wants to see if olindo took the competition seriously this week. I agree with this move because if olind'oh shanks one again he's done.

butler has a concussion, hogan replaces him.

Hogan is active? Superbowl.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ed bell Newbie

ed bell

Posted
Posted

How can this possibly be a surprise?

The kid kicked one... count em one... FG in college and you expected him to start?

Exactly, and going back to high school he's 11-15. The kid undoubtedly has a serious leg, but he's got virtually zero experience kicking FG's. He did do some punting in HS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Irv

Guest Irv

Posted
Posted

Also im kinda surprised with tutu being inactive considering he had four catches for a 111 yards and two touchdowns against the Texans last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

So you're saying he'll never play because he kicked only one FG in college. Have to start somewhere.

But, if his leg is that strong, you would think that he would have kicked some fg's in college if he had any kind of accuracy at all. The more I think about it, the more I think that this signing had only one purpose, that being to shake Mare up a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamcline Newbie

iamcline

Posted
Posted

Exactly, and going back to high school he's 11-15. The kid undoubtedly has a serious leg, but he's got virtually zero experience kicking FG's. He did do some punting in HS.

When your team isn't playoff bound, you threw money in his lap...you let him go out there and let it rip. There's only one way to get experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...