Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd McShay First Mock Draft

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

Recommended Posts

Oldschool Leroy Experienced

Oldschool Leroy

Posted
Posted

No way a running back goes 4th, they will take Blackmon instead. RB's have lost their appeal. Doubt one will go before 15. Look at Alabama RB from last year that dropped into the second half of draft.

Cleveland may have to pick a QB if they can't settle with the Mccoy's who believe the browns handled his concussion injury wrongly. It could get ugly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bj-Monster23 Newbie

Bj-Monster23

Posted
Posted

No way a running back goes 4th, they will take Blackmon instead. RB's have lost their appeal. Doubt one will go before 15. Look at Alabama RB from last year that dropped into the second half of draft.

I would like to think Cleveland would take a QB also. There are rumblings going on and they are saying Peyton Hillis wont resign with the Browns in the offseason. This could be the reason why Todd mcshay has Trent Richardson who is the most complete RB I have seen, since AP come out mock there at 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

Hillis is a head case. They do not want him any longer. they will get a new RB, but they have two 1st rounders. They will take Richardson with the second if they want. He might still be there. One better option would be for them to get a QB or Blackmon with the first pick and then trade for J Stewart with the late first rounder or their second. Stewart will be a proven workhorse that is better than Richardson and will come without using pick #4.

No way they will take Richardson that early

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ken Newbie

Ken

Posted
Posted

Thats understandable, but there Wide receiver core is horrible.

True but Gabbert isn't helping things. They went from middle of the pack offensively to last in the league with virtually the same WR's plus they have Lewis at TE...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...