Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers 2012 Opponents Locked In.


Cat'sGrowl

Recommended Posts

Since our AFC division is the west process of elimination would state Giants considering we cannot be playing the Jets since they are in the AFC north, :idea: duh

lol this fine young male negged me for not knowing we only play AFC West next season. What are you 12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tampa bay should be two automatic wins

denver, kansas city, san diego, oakland, chicago, seattle... none of these teams scare me

that's 8 games right there that are very winnable

nfc east won't be a pushover but I don't see them as some unbeatable powerhouse either

atlanta isn't all that tough either, they're definitely beatable

the only really elite team i see on there is NO

it looks like a good setup to make a run at the playoffs/winning record. if we fall short they'll be nobody to blame but ourselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol this fine young male negged me for not knowing we only play AFC West next season. What are you 12?

Coming from the guy who is name calling, hilarious and all you had to do was look at the list to know we were playing the AFC west dipsh1t took me about a second obviously your a little slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...