Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what rule would you like to see changed this summer


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

That would and should never happen. It's what the refs are there for and there are judgment calls.
games shouldn't be decided on judgement calls.

until they can call flawless games, they should be allowed to be checked on calls they make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then what's the point of refs? They are part of the game. There will never be a flawless game by the refs. Judgment calls usually mean they can go either way.

Should we have technology within the ball to detect yardage and within the shoulder pads that detects contact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the absolute worst rule is the rules governing overtime.

they made the playoff rules a little better, but they still suck.

both teams need to have a chance to score. i can't see how it benefits the game to let a team win because of a coin flip.

Make it simple. Full quarter of play and the team with most points wins. If score is still tied; have a second overtime period the team that scores first wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PI should be 15 yards...

a 40 yard penaltiy is absurd.

So when a receiver burns a DB and is wide open streaking down the sideline, the DB should dive at his feet and trip him up to get a 15 yard penalty instead of a score? I don't think that's real fair. They should keep PI how it is, just school the refs to not call it unless it's flagrant.

Also, last nights game made me think forward progress needs to be changed. The 49er D barely got on the RB and half a second later they kill the play and call FP. What they should do is let the play continue and then after he is tackled, then you can go re-spot the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when a receiver burns a DB and is wide open streaking down the sideline, the DB should dive at his feet and trip him up to get a 15 yard penalty instead of a score? I don't think that's real fair. They should keep PI how it is, just school the refs to not call it unless it's flagrant.

Also, last nights game made me think forward progress needs to be changed. The 49er D barely got on the RB and half a second later they kill the play and call FP. What they should do is let the play continue and then after he is tackled, then you can go re-spot the ball.

that was just a bogus call last night...

agree to disagree on the PI... i think it hurts the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when a receiver burns a DB and is wide open streaking down the sideline, the DB should dive at his feet and trip him up to get a 15 yard penalty instead of a score? I don't think that's real fair. They should keep PI how it is, just school the refs to not call it unless it's flagrant.

Also, last nights game made me think forward progress needs to be changed. The 49er D barely got on the RB and half a second later they kill the play and call FP. What they should do is let the play continue and then after he is tackled, then you can go re-spot the ball.

Name a rule that helps a defense more than the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then what's the point of refs? They are part of the game. There will never be a flawless game by the refs. Judgment calls usually mean they can go either way.

Should we have technology within the ball to detect yardage and within the shoulder pads that detects contact?

meh...you are taking it to an extreme. are you of the opinion that refs shouldn't be challenged and that coaches shouldn't be allowed that red flag?

there is no harm in being able to challenge penalty calls. it can't be any worse than the challenges that are already being allowed. i mean they already started making an automatic review of every TD. it's not like it made refs obsolete.

as long as they have challenges and time outs available i don't see how it makes it any worse for refs than what is there already. it just makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys aren't being realistic. Any rule change to help the defense isn't coming. You just have to accept offenses will be able to slice up the most perfect defenses.

Something that is a problem however are some ref calls that are easily deciding games because of the monumental nature the game is heading towards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The motto means nothing if they lay down and submit to the opponent. One of the most embarrassing things I have seen from twenty years of being a fan.  Regardless if the lead seems to be insurmountable, you keep giving 110% untill the final second. Canales is definitely a Beta and it wasn't a good look at all. I wonder what the locker room was whispering about after that sh%t. I hope we never see this again and he actually grows a pair of balls. He needs to look in the mirror and understand that you just don't do that in the NFL. Maybe peewee football so kids don't get hurt. Throw the 3rd stringers in to run the play and finish the game wirh some some pride and don't bend the knee.  
    • No but we should have kept both of them. People complaining about what he got paid can’t say much now because it’s absolutely worth it to get 15 sacks which we could desperately use, especially when you compare it to some of the free agents we have signed to try to replace that production (none of them have come close and we are wasting good money on them) 
    • That period started rough but the canes stayed with it.  They will when this game 3-1 or 4-2 the way it’s going. 
×
×
  • Create New...