Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we need another tight end?


Dex

Recommended Posts

Shockey is still productive but getting older and while I loved the Olsen acquisition I still feel as if there is more to be done. Most of everyone on the Huddle seems to love Bardinage and while I'm also excited to see him in the new system I think we need a star TE and if the opportunity presents itself we should act. TE's like Graham, Davis and Gronk are all MAJOR parts of their respected offenses. Now before this get's GIF approved please hear me out. Let's say we take a DE/OLB & a CB in the first and second round. Barring a trade that leaves us without a 3rd and onto our 4th. Now I've been watching Ladarius Green for quite sometime now and he has major potential. As of right now he's projected to go between round 4-6 but is likely to slip due to him being undersized 6-6 237. This dude is a play maker, matchup nightmare and is very fast for his size. Now the question is if he is there in the 4th/5th/6th do we pull the trigger?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like where we're at at TE. Olsen isn't going to be a super star but he holds it down when he's in. If we resign Shockey he's adds so much to our offense , he's got fire, and leadership and he's a solid player. I'm happy with the two of them.
Ok.... sensitive.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think we need another TE. Shockey's still got some years left. Barnidge played well when given the chance. Give it at least 1 more year, then after next season if Shockey is done and Barnidge doesn't show that he can be a good #2 TE we can look at TEs in the next draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary barnidge is still on the team plus he just got extended. Don't be surprised if we don't re-sign shockey

GYI0058965785_crop_450x500.jpg?1258774260

I got the sense they might not sign him either. Honestly I think that would be a mistake. Shockey is twice the blocker that either Barnidge or Olsen is at this point and is a real tough presence in the locker room. If we are going to build an aggressive offense, then Shockey is perfect in that role.

Funny. I never thought I would be defending Shockey before this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Gary showed some promise. I love the co-canes as our primary te's but I would love another playmaker. I thought we should have gotten te's in every draft for the past 9 years. Hmmmm... Odd how long was fox here again? Oh yea.... 9 fuggin tight endless years!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

barnidge has done less in his first four years than dwayne jarrett

yeah im sure with a different playbook he'll be a probowler and stuff

as a te yes but as a ST'er Barnidge is fantastic

yes I know that isn't relevant to the "do we need a TE" question lol, just saying. Barnidge shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as jarrett.

seeing guys like Gronkowski, Graham, etc completely dominate means if a good TE fell to us, absolutely yes I'd take one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you need someone to run your multi-billion dollar business, maaayyyybe don't hire a guy whose previous work experience includes repeated blows to the head and literal brain damage but IDK.
    • Extrapolate that with every QB for that matter. I guarantee you there's quite a bit of missed opportunities and yards left on the field for everyone. Many NFL QBs deal with WRs not putting in A+ effort, subpar o-line play and other deficiencies. The great ones are able to rise above these issues and create opportunities for plays. Guys like Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes can both play in and out of structure, as well as find ways to get yards when things break down and mask mistakes by throwing guys open, creating opportunities from nothing, etc. Bryce Young has only shown he's able to make things happen when the rest of the team picks up his slack. Very rarely does he create those opportunities himself. When this is a consistent pattern year after year with Bryce where he shows up lackluster, it's a concern. This is year three and he should be elevating the team as a first overall pick this franchise traded up for.  He was far from elevating anyone against JAX. In fact, he needed others to elevate and create for him. Excuses may be fine for a rookie, but this is year three for the first overall pick. Not looking good so far.
    • I think the worst issue is coaching. Countless bad snaps, XL not getting his feet in or trying on runs plays, our centre being down field when he didn't need to be. All seem to be from poor coaching for me. I believe Canales is to soft to rip the players a new one when the fug up. Plus I honestly believe that Canales is slow getting his plays in giving Bryce less time to diagnose and adjust to the defence. Don't worry I could of head butted Bryce for that fumble and the 4th down throw aways but the other plays are explainable to me 
×
×
  • Create New...