Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Official All Day Superbowl XLVI Thread


Jangler

Recommended Posts

this is the least enthused about a super bowl I have ever been. I don't care for either team and it feels like a rerun.

I think the giants win because the pats haven't played a team in weeks that can actually throw the ball well, and their secondary is god awful. they've lucked out by playing run first teams throughout the last month or so, so they look better than they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it'll be Patriots 31 - Giants 20.

I'm actually pretty excited about watching it. Tom Brady has the chance to do something only two other QBs in the history of football have done, by winning four Super Bowls. I don't know if that'll ever happen again (except for Cam, of course.), and it's pretty exciting to watch.

Oh, and there's the commercials, which should be pretty cool.

But, the halftime show is going to suck something awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how they wanted to go "more conservative" after the Janet Jackson, and then was like, who's the most conservative singer in the music industry? It's GOT to be Madonna, right?

None of her songs are about sex, she didn't make out with Britney Spears on tv, right? Oh, and I'm sure the demographic of the Super Bowl, 18-50 year old males, will definitely love Madonna's music! It's been an the top of the charts for weeks! Yeah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...