Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rentors...how much is your rent?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Just curious - I currently pay $282/month but the house is falling apart. You get what you pay for. Since I'm getting ready to move, it seems like the absolute MINIMUM rent is about $400/mo with roommates. Most decent 2+br houses are $1500/mo or more. How much are you paying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good god man...$282?? you'd be in the fuging hood of all hoods if you were in Charlotte

The house is $1130 a month, 4br. So $282.50 per person. I had 3 roommates but since the house is in pretty crappy condition we've all decided to split ways. The landlord is about to renovate and raise the rent. It's in a good location and if the house was in better condition, it'd be a pretty sweet pad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

400.00 a month in rural Rowan Co.

3 bedrooms, 2 bath on an acre of land out in the quiet country. Now the landlord and I were friends who did this when he moved out and into a new home, so I don't know what it would be if he actually put it on the market for rent.

I also don't have a rental agreement and my payments won't change.

I lucked out for sure.

Also, WTF is a "rentor"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The house is $1130 a month, 4br. So $282.50 per person. I had 3 roommates but since the house is in pretty crappy condition we've all decided to split ways. The landlord is about to renovate and raise the rent. It's in a good location and if the house was in better condition, it'd be a pretty sweet pad.

oooooooooooooooooh ook that makes sense...I thought you meant....well, we all know what I thought

carry on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...