Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock hits all the Huddle sore spots; Luck vs. Newton, AJ, and Coples


teeray

Recommended Posts

Is cam still black? Ok there are still work ethic questions. Is Luck still white and the next combo of elway/Marino/Montana rolled into one? Ok then the analysts will take him over a lazy black guy who relied simply on athletic ability to combine for 35 touchdowns and throw for over 4,000 yards in his rookie season. fug this noise.

Another EPIC FAIL trying to turn any negative question about Cam into ANYTHING to do with race.

Let it go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what point is there any other reasoning for the questioning?

He has shown 0 percent cause for concern regarding his work ethic. ZERO.

I am not saying he is purposefully racist, but continuing to make points about the concern about work ethic is ridiculous.

I think he is still waiting for Cam to fail, so he can tell us "I told you he was lazy", he obviously didn't work hard and got caught up into wanting to be entertainer.

The work ethic questions are really pissing me off. According to ALL accounts, Newton has worked relentlessly. There be zero reasons to even let the questions of work ethic arise. Turnovers? Maybe. Leadership? I'd listen to an argument. But it's still not an issue. But, the work ethic things are fuging stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The question is how well will NFL defenses adapt to what Carolina did a year ago and will Cam Newton continue to work as hard as he needs to to stay ahead of that curve?"

I also really appreciate the fact that he seems to feel that NFL defenses, after the first few games of the season last year, never had the chance to satisfactorily adjust to the Cam phenomenon. Never bothered to watch film on Cam and make a defensive game plan to try and stop him, I guess.

"Who is this Cam guy? I mean, he's already played 6/7/8/9/10/etc. games now and we can get the film on him if we want to, but you know? I think we'll just not do that and make our game plan for the Panthers game this week a guessing game with no adjustments from watching film!"

Yeah, Mayock... that's exactly what happened each and every week, you douche!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, to be fair, to say Mayock is a Philly guy and Philly reacted negatively when McNabb was drafted therefore Mayock must be a closet racist is the same thing as saying Cam is lazy because he's black...

not that I'm giving any credence to Mayock's belief...or have any desire to defend people from Philly...

Yeah, that's stereotyping in the same way I was complaining about Cam being stereotyped... so forget about that - good call.

My point is, what has Cam done (or not done) to cause anyone to have concerns about his work ethic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what point is there any other reasoning for the questioning?

He has shown 0 percent cause for concern regarding his work ethic. ZERO.

I am not saying he is purposefully racist, but continuing to make points about the concern about work ethic is ridiculous.

I think he is still waiting for Cam to fail, so he can tell us "I told you he was lazy", he obviously didn't work hard and got caught up into wanting to be entertainer.

The work ethic questions are really pissing me off. According to ALL accounts, Newton has worked relentlessly. There be zero reasons to even let the questions of work ethic arise. Turnovers? Maybe. Leadership? I'd listen to an argument. But it's still not an issue. But, the work ethic things are fuging stupid.

The fact that you equate someone questioning an athlete's work ethic to being a racial remark proves only ONE thing....that you are likely a racist.

Cam's success WAS due to his unique skillset....and Chud's ability to really create a unique offense. Cam will have to continue to develop as a passer, because defense WILL adapt to some of the things that he was able to do. It is in NO WAY a guaranteed racially motivated remark.

Mayock very well may be a racist, but it is still SAD that so many STILL claim racism if anyone questions Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another EPIC FAIL trying to turn any negative question about Cam into ANYTHING to do with race.

Let it go.

Yeah, you just keep on believin' in your pipe dream where all racism has been eliminated from this world (and the NFL) and we all live amongst cotton candy clouds, lollipop trees, and lemon drop suns! Wheeeeeee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you equate someone questioning an athlete's work ethic to being a racial remark proves only ONE thing....that you are likely a racist.

Looks like someone led a very sheltered life to not immediately understand this VERY COMMON, very old, and racist stereotype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you equate someone questioning an athlete's work ethic to being a racial remark proves only ONE thing....that you are likely a racist.

Cam's success WAS due to his unique skillset....and Chud's ability to really create a unique offense. Cam will have to continue to develop as a passer, because defense WILL adapt to some of the things that he was able to do. It is in NO WAY a guaranteed racially motivated remark.

Mayock very well may be a racist, but it is still SAD that so many STILL claim racism if anyone questions Cam.

Yes. I am a racist. Busted. lulz.

I am not necessarily equating the questions due to racism. I am saying, why the discrepancy with Cam and not other quarterbacks. Why would he still bring it up? Why keep talking about it when there is no evidence for it?

I wouldn't claim race if he mentioned turnovers, or even leadership ability.

But knowing that African Americans have been unfairly stereotyped, throughout American history, as lazy and having a bad work ethic. It makes me wonder why he would still bring up this concern with just Cam.

Also, stay classy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you equate someone questioning an athlete's work ethic to being a racial remark proves only ONE thing....that you are likely a racist.

Cam's success WAS due to his unique skillset....and Chud's ability to really create a unique offense. Cam will have to continue to develop as a passer, because defense WILL adapt to some of the things that he was able to do. It is in NO WAY a guaranteed racially motivated remark.

Mayock very well may be a racist, but it is still SAD that so many STILL claim racism if anyone questions Cam.

His success was also due to his work ethic...which for some reason is still in question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...