Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pep vs. Otah: A hypothetical that begs the question.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Since many of you complain about Pep's inability to get to the QB even if he isn't double teamed, should I assume that high caliber O-line players like Otah are not making the mark if they allow one with Pep's ability to get to the QB once or twice per game?

Will you turn on Otah with the speed and vitriolic tirades like you have done with Pep, and lambaste him for taking plays off, when it is obvious that he's one of the best in the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otah allowed 5 sacks I believe. Not exactly once a game.

He also has a 5 year contract worth considerably less than what Pep is set to make this year alone.

Yes, this is just a hypothetical, but my contention is that Pep is arguably the best DE in the game, so if Otah can let lesser players get to Delhomme, what would he do against Pep (not to mention the hurries and Pep's ability to otherwise break down O-lines by clearing a path for someone else to get the sack)? Pep averaged nearly a sack per game against more experienced competition, and yet many hang him to the cross.

Like it or not, Pep has earned his money, or the FO wouldn't have put it out there. Otah will get his in time.

My point is that Pep is probably judged a bit too harshly, especially considering the body of work of his entire career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that Pep is probably judged a bit too harshly, especially considering the body of work of his entire career.

Well for me, it's a matter of what I think he should be doing based on his ability with what he actually does that is the rub.

He's got great ability, but doesn't always play like it IMO. If he did, he wouldn't have as many games where he was bested by backup OL players. Note I didn't say ALL games...I realize that even great players have off days or are bested on matchups at times or are so successfully gameplanned for that they are taken out of a game. With a guy like him, I expect to see more plays like those INTs he has had at times...game changing plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a guy like Pep should be able to work Otah on occasion on passing downs.....Otah excells more w/ run blocking. Otah did well giving up few sacks....I expect him to give up a few more than 5 next season b/c I hope he is on the field more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is just a hypothetical, but my contention is that Pep is arguably the best DE in the game, so if Otah can let lesser players get to Delhomme, what would he do against Pep (not to mention the hurries and Pep's ability to otherwise break down O-lines by clearing a path for someone else to get the sack)? Pep averaged nearly a sack per game against more experienced competition, and yet many hang him to the cross.

Like it or not, Pep has earned his money, or the FO wouldn't have put it out there. Otah will get his in time.

My point is that Pep is probably judged a bit too harshly, especially considering the body of work of his entire career.

he was getting pushed around by rookies and 2nd and sometimes 3rd string OTs. a player of his caliber shouldn't be letting that happen and it shouldn't matter much against "more experienced competition".

i would like for him to play here up to his potential but he hasn't shown that he can live up to his potential. blaming it on something else other than him is a weak thing to do. he has been given every opportunity to be successful and has to a point. only thing that has really held him back is himself.

comparing him to otah...a rookie? c'mon. the guy has only played football for 5 years. to allow only 5 sacks being that raw? pretty impressive. it wasn't clady good but i'll take it for a rookie.

compare him with gross if you want but comparing with otah is weak sauce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that Pep is probably judged a bit too harshly, especially considering the body of work of his entire career.
isn't that the criticism many have with supporting jake, that they are focusing too much on the body of his career rather than what he is doing now?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

gross is the best. that is why he has the giant contract and that is why he is playing LT.

how many sacks did he allow last year playing the best DEs in the league (the RDEs)? 3

he has allowed only 3 sacks in 3 of his 6 years. he allowed 5 in 2 others and 7 in his sophomore effort. gross is the best OT we have.

did he make a big deal about getting moved around every year? he didn't like it but he went with it. could he have made a big deal about getting tagged? yes. he didn't like it but he went with it. did he pull his head out of his rump and decide to sign it. yes. he just wanted to play.

has he given us reason to lambaste him? no. has peppers? absolutely. his performance in '07 and the crap he is pulling now. if he pulls his head out of his butt and realizes that this situation is as good as any other out there for him or just decides that given the current situation that it may be best to follow the example of haynesworth and sign the tender under stipulations that he won't be tagged again if he reaches certain goals and then goes into an uncapped year...i will have very little problem with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...