Panthers sort of mentioned as a team that MIGHT show interest in Vincent Jackson

[Razeyfingers]

Shefter was spoon fed at the NFLN.

While i still think he's allright, he takes more stabs in the dark now that heks with ESPN.

Nothing but the charger connection.

I also don't see the panthers paying enough to land vincent.

Espn tells every one of its operations to sensationalize and piss people off how ever they can get ratings.

mmm kind always thought thats why Moose didnt want to do the Frank n Moose show, idk

[megadeth078]

NJPanthers should just stay on twitter where we can't see him.

Can we still neg to smack central?

[Ruff]

When did ESPN take time out of their normal The Golden Calf of Bristol/Jeremy Lin schedule to talk about the Panthers of all teams?

[jherald]

I wish we could afford to. Talk about major targets for the big guy. Lafell really showed out this season, Naane is pretty much still garbage but between Jackson, Smitty, Lafell, Olsen, and Shockey, Cam would be loving life.

So would I.

[Panthro]

title is a bit more accurate now

[bleys]

umm in no way did i say i am hearing this. it is copy and pasted straight from rotoworld. also havent posted anything from my source on here in months. never will what anyone tells me on a message board will make me think i am a joke haha that is just ridiculous.

the awkward laughter is a bit misleading, but I have to assume your survival instinct is strong enough to believe that...

[Razeyfingers]

Shefter knows how to keep it sexy and interesting. All you gotta do is tell the kids there might be a new WR in the future and they'll stayed glued to the story. You dont even have to worry about lying since you later get to tell them Gettis is healthy.

It's kind of when you have to do the old "Look there's no Santa Claus, but hey dont tell your little brother and you'll still get craps loads of awesome gifts"

[Lumps]

title is a bit more accurate now

Take note NJ. Perfect example of the context in which your threads should be titled. Of course, you won't be fooling as many people and won't get as many readers, so your ego might be hurt a bit but your credibility will still suck so nothing lost there.

[Dpantherman]

What's amazing is you refusing to admit that you made a mistake, which is NOT something that responsible journalists do. Its ok to be wrong, its not ok to continue to spew inaccuracies after they've been revealed.

I don't understand what the big deal is, the only thing you are doing right now is making an ass of yourself.

[bleys]

What's amazing is you refusing to admit that you made a mistake, which is NOT something that responsible journalists do. Its ok to be wrong, its not ok to continue to spew inaccuracies after they've been revealed.

I don't understand what the big deal is, the only thing you are doing right now is making an ass of yourself.

you would have to direct that towards a journalist, first and foremost... much less a responsible one...

[NJPanthers12]

Take note NJ. Perfect example of the context in which your threads should be titled. Of course, you won't be fooling as many people and won't get as many readers, so your ego might be hurt a bit but your credibility will still suck so nothing lost there.

I do have more followers compared to last year so I am fine.

[NJPanthers12]

What's amazing is you refusing to admit that you made a mistake, which is NOT something that responsible journalists do. Its ok to be wrong, its not ok to continue to spew inaccuracies after they've been revealed.

I don't understand what the big deal is, the only thing you are doing right now is making an ass of yourself.

What mistake did I make? I copied and pasted something from rotoworld. It stated Schefter reported the Panthers as a potential suitor. Then rotoworld went on to say that these statements were most likely based off his inside sources. Seriously get over it the thread title. This is the front page of the New York Times. It is how I interpreted it as did rotoworld.

[MadHatter]

What mistake did I make? I copied and pasted something from rotoworld. It stated Schefter reported the Panthers as a potential suitor. Then rotoworld went on to say that these statements were most likely based off his inside sources. Seriously get over it the thread title. This is the front page of the New York Times. It is how I interpreted it as did rotoworld.

"Potential suitor" is not even close to the same meaning as "Showing Interest In".

You fail again.

[chef17]

What mistake did I make? I copied and pasted something from rotoworld. It stated Schefter reported the Panthers as a potential suitor. Then rotoworld went on to say that these statements were most likely based off his inside sources. Seriously get over it the thread title. This is the front page of the New York Times. It is how I interpreted it as did rotoworld.

Think you are missing this key part here. Because it is likely based on his sources doesn't make it fact.