Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2 teams give you two offers saturday...


frash.exe

Which offer do you take for Peppers? (lets just say he signed the tender)  

78 members have voted

  1. 1. Which offer do you take for Peppers? (lets just say he signed the tender)

    • Team A's 2009 1st rounder + 2009 3rd rounder
      34
    • Team B's 2010 1st rounder + 2010 2nd rounder
      29
    • Keep Peppers, I don't like either of those offers
      15


Recommended Posts

Although according to the trade charts a 1st next year ='s a 2nd this year

they both have their perks. On one hand, you can cash in now and we could really use a first round talent on the defensive line. Plus that extra third will permit us to get an extra depth player.

...on the other hand, you double your amount of first day picks for next year. You basically do what I like to call "team stock investing". It basically means that, say it was the Browns that gave the second offer. Depending on how good or bad the Browns are in 2009 dictates how high or low the first rounder they gave to us will be. So we could conceivably be picking in the top 10 in 2010 with the chance to trade down and accumulate even more picks. Plus, this isn't really the deepest draft in overall talent this year anyway.

the real tradeoff is time. and that's why the trade charts say what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't decide until we know which teams we are talking about. If it is Kansas City they may or may not be a top 10 pick next year but definitely are a number 3 pick this year. On the other hand a team like NE will be a a 23rd pick this year and likely a later pick next year. That would make a big difference. A 3 pick next year might be worth more than a number 23 pick this year.

Right now ths poll is lame without more specifics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...