Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick Poll # 2


Skew

Recommended Posts

Both Poll # 1 and Poll # 2 were actually part of a scientific experiment. Considering the time value of money, the correct answer for both is to wait for the larger value. It was used to explain that even when buying and selling stocks and commodities on the stock market (which is suppose to be void of emotional decisions), people still make money decisions based on emotions. Which is part of the blame for the current economic crisis (emotional decision making helped cause the housing market to bubble, along with other factors).

When Poll # 1 was asked of 100 people on the street, 90% of the people knew the wise thing to do was wait the extra day for the larger value. But when the same people were asked the question from Poll # 2, the majority of the people took the $100 today, even though the wise decision is to wait for the larger value. Due to emotional decision making instead of logical decison making.

This test proved the same thing.

Thanks for being my test subjects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Poll # 1 and Poll # 2 were actually part of a scientific experiment. Considering the time value of money, the correct answer for both is to wait for the larger value. It was used to explain that even when buying and selling stocks and commodities on the stock market (which is suppose to be void of emotional decisions), people still make money decisions based on emotions. Which is part of the blame for the current economic crisis (emotional decision making helped cause the housing market to bubble, along with other factors).

When Poll # 1 was asked of 100 people on the street, 90% of the people knew the wise thing to do was wait the extra day for the larger value. But when the same people were asked the question from Poll # 2, the majority of the people took the $100 today, even though the wise decision is to wait for the larger value. Due to emotional decision making instead of logical decison making.

This test proved the same thing.

Thanks for being my test subjects.

Sometimes taking the money in the present is better than in the future.

Inflation, current financial status, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we get a cookie?

Nah, I just wanted to see if I got the same basic results. If asked of me, I would have said the larger of each, only because I've studied and work with the time value of money so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The term you're looking for is "malinger(ed)", and he didn't.  I'm not sure why Panthers fans act like jaded ex girlfriends.  The dude is clearly injury prone as his time in San Fransico also proves. It's not like he got to San Fran and stopped having problems.
    • My long and rambling post:   The guy is all heart, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he came back even better next year. He’s exactly the guy you lock up. The money won’t ever change the way he plays.  It was a big fumble, but what 1,000 yard back fumbles once in an entire season?  Pride. This team is FINALLY seeing guys who obviously take the game very seriously. Hunt, Chuba, Thielen, Brown, Horn (CB), Coker, Bryce (IMHO). Bye bye, Spider-Man. I don’t see these dudes being OK with teammates half-assing practice or in games. I can see Brown and Horn coming over to talk to somebody.  Good team? Ummm, maybe, but will still likely lose more close games than they win unless this last draft turns in to LOB part 2. That’s a stretch.  Pretty good/decent team. Yes. They finished the season as a pretty good team. I know I sound like a broken record harping back to it, but going in to ATL and putting a 40 burger on them en route to an OT win. A bad Panthers team would have had their brakes beaten off. We’ve seen it.  Rose colored glasses on and bonging a 40 of hopium: There are watershed moments that occur that change the course of franchises, both good and bad. If Fox doesn’t pull Rodney at halftime, the epic journey that was 2003 never happens. On the negative side, Cam taking that one hit from Watt was the end of any and all Panthers relevancy and we’ve been the biggest losers in all of pro sports as a result. Watershed moments. LOB draft. Vinny goes down and the goat is born.  Will the ATL game be the spark that this franchise has desperately needed? Could it be that they hit the mega million jackpot with Princley and Scourton as eat QBs for breakfast? Sure would be nice having 2 all-pro edge guys on the cheap for the next 4 years.  A lot of unknowns, but at least it actually feels  fun again. 
    • Ok LT and Petersen are a cut above everyone else to me cmc and Faulk are interchangeable on this list.  though Faulk was better career wise
×
×
  • Create New...