Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Te Coby Fleener In The Second?


Kuech Da Sneak

Recommended Posts

What do you guys think of the TE out of Stanford?

If you watched any Standford games this or last season, you know how much of a beast he is. Catches pretty much everything that comes his way.

Had a good pro day too. At 6-6, 247, he ran an average of 4.47 (Between Mayock & McShay's watches).

He has the perfect size and speed to make more than enough match up problems, and would fit perfectly in Chud's 2 TE sets.

Some say he won't even make it down to our spot in the 2nd, but if he does, do you take him? I'm in favor of it, even though we need defense.

It's hard to pass up on tall, athletic, proven TEs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Fleener will be a good TE in the league, but we cant use a top pick on a TE. We have too many positions that we don't have starting level talent. Since this team can't afford/refuses to get starter through FA, we have to get a starter with our first 2 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually been thinking for a couple weeks we might pull the trigger on Fleener if he there in the 2nd. Seems like a luxury pick, but Chud loves to utilize TE's and having two weapons like Fleener and Olsen to go along with our other weapons would terrify defensive coordinators. Rather go defense in the 2nd though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is available at our pick in the 2nd that would be stunning. It really is a luxury pick, adding a weapon to an offense that's projected to be one of the best. I like his size and speed, he really could be an amazing pickup.

However I don't think he will be there. Plenty of teams between 9th and 40th picks could use a guy like him. How about an Andrew Luck reunion in Indy?

I'm 50/50 on it. If he's there I think you take him because he could be a star for the next 10 years. To do that you would need to ignore all of our deficiencies on defense for another season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, signing up for FanDuel Network, and then canceling FanDuel Network:
    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
×
×
  • Create New...