Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please Reassure Me Our Fo Is Gonna Trade J.stew


Dash Global

Recommended Posts

I wish people would get off this trade Stewart nonsense.

Yes, Tolbert can play RB but he will most likely be used as the Fullback.

The holes can be filled without getting rid of Stewart.

A-Muthafuggin-Men!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find it amazing how people want to sbip off our best runningback.

Xojmt me as one that hopes that Stew remains a Panther.

I don't think anyone on here WANTS to get rid of Stew. We just look at the situation and realize that it is not likely to sign him long-term after the DWill contract. We can debate whether DWill should have gotten that contract.....and most would say no.

But, that ship has sailed and we are where we are.

I personally would take Stew over DWilll in a heartbeat. However, I am also in the camp that says signing him long-term at the end of the season is not likely and quite frankly would not be smart.

This is a passing league now and tying up $16-20M of cap space (15% of the Cap) in the RB position is not wise.

If we can get a 2nd for him, we should ABSOLUTELY make the trade. A 3rd and it is a more difficult decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would we trade one of the top 5 weapons in our offense? Tolbert could be a top 10 weapon, but he hasnt earned top 5 here yet. it just doesnt make sense...

2x 2nds maybe, but just a 2nd for Stew? Ludacris, and Im not talkin about the rapper...

Can we get all these 'trade Stew' threads merged, please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would we trade one of the top 5 weapons in our offense? Tolbert could be a top 10 weapon, but he hasnt earned top 5 here yet. it just doesnt make sense...

2x 2nds maybe, but just a 2nd for Stew? Ludacris, and Im not talkin about the rapper...

Can we get all these 'trade Stew' threads merged, please?

I certainly hope that Tolbert would rank higher than more than one of our offensive linemen as a weapon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we now have the most lethal backfield in the NFL. could end up being the most lethal ever.

build around what we have. get a defense that doesn't suck and keep building our WR corps and improve the Oline as needed and there won't be many teams who could stand in the panthers way.

build on and around your strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1715845552_tn_memes_no_face_of_course_not_answer_2_xlarge.jpeg

Tolbert was signed as a FB and the only way you trade Stewart is if he isnt going to sign a long term deal.

P.S. whole=/=hole

Tolbert can do more things in this offense than DeAngelo. Williams

is a better runner.....Tolbert with his overall skill set is pretty dang good. Tolbert is not Brad Hoover

and won't be used as such.

Stewart will sign a big fat deal.....not a matter of will he do it. Carolina will try to get him to take less and that is why they have been trying to talk.....Stewart wont talk bc he wants his big payday and that doesn't set itself up until after this year. He is better than Williams in this offense....and he and his agent know to wait until after this season to talk and they will talk big dollars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we now have the most lethal backfield in the NFL. could end up being the most lethal ever.

build around what we have. get a defense that doesn't suck and keep building our WR corps and improve the Oline as needed and there won't be many teams who could stand in the panthers way.

build on and around your strengths.

Hard to "build" in all of those areas when you tie up 15% of your total Cap Space in the RB postion....that is the issue.

Under a salary cap, hard decisions must be made. Sometimes you have to sacrifice in an area of great strength to improve in other areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we now have the most lethal backfield in the NFL. could end up being the most lethal ever.

build around what we have. get a defense that doesn't suck and keep building our WR corps and improve the Oline as needed and there won't be many teams who could stand in the panthers way.

build on and around your strengths.

Impossible to be awesome everywhere.....so if you choose to build an uber backfield you accept the fact you won't be ideally strong somewhere. What positions do you think in today's NFL we can be weak at and still win consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the same people who are talking about building the greatest running team of blah blah blah are the same that claimed early last season that it's a passing league and you don't need a strong running game to win.

It's like whatever the Panther have is the secret to winning despite the pesky fact that we aren't winning yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...