Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Tannehill Wows On Pro Day

Murph

By Murph,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

No later than 8.

I think it benefits us more if he goes #4 because that means the Browns will not take Richardson.. the Bucs will be able to take richardson at #5, thus we have a better shot at getting Claiborne. The Bucs are going to take RIchardson or Claiborne, that is almost guaranteed. Tannehill going before us, only helps us either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

I think it benefits us more if he goes #4 because that means the Browns will not take Richardson.. the Bucs will be able to take richardson at #5, thus we have a better shot at getting Claiborne. The Bucs are going to take RIchardson or Claiborne, that is almost guaranteed. Tannehill going before us, only helps us either way.

A agree, but I have to see the math first--let me extend your thought if I may:

1. COLTS Luck

2. SKINS RGIII

3. VIKES Kalil (Possible Claiborne threat--mild)

4. BROWNS Tannehill

5. BUCS Richardson (Possible Claiborne threat--Have Wright and Barber, however, no solid RB)

6. RAMS Blackmon (Possible Claiborne threat-mild)

7 JAGS Reiff or Ingram (Need RT and DE--Jax reporter says they prefer Ingram to Coples)--I will go with INGRAM here.

8. PHINS Reiff/Coples (Need RT and DE--Claiborne threat. Added Richard Marshall in free agency, but they could use a CB too); REIFF

9. PANTHERS Coples/Claiborne (RR is said to want to upgrade the pass rush; he is also said to devalue CBs a bit--Would he take Claiborne if Coples is on the board?) I think he would take Claiborne because he is BPA and at a need--Gamble cannot play #1 CB forever. CLAIBORNE

I would say there is about a 25% chance he falls to us, then about a 70% we take him if he is there. Just guesses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Official Panthers roster cuts thread

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • tukafan21
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • tukafan21
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...