Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Tannehill Wows On Pro Day

Murph

By Murph,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

No later than 8.

I think it benefits us more if he goes #4 because that means the Browns will not take Richardson.. the Bucs will be able to take richardson at #5, thus we have a better shot at getting Claiborne. The Bucs are going to take RIchardson or Claiborne, that is almost guaranteed. Tannehill going before us, only helps us either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

I think it benefits us more if he goes #4 because that means the Browns will not take Richardson.. the Bucs will be able to take richardson at #5, thus we have a better shot at getting Claiborne. The Bucs are going to take RIchardson or Claiborne, that is almost guaranteed. Tannehill going before us, only helps us either way.

A agree, but I have to see the math first--let me extend your thought if I may:

1. COLTS Luck

2. SKINS RGIII

3. VIKES Kalil (Possible Claiborne threat--mild)

4. BROWNS Tannehill

5. BUCS Richardson (Possible Claiborne threat--Have Wright and Barber, however, no solid RB)

6. RAMS Blackmon (Possible Claiborne threat-mild)

7 JAGS Reiff or Ingram (Need RT and DE--Jax reporter says they prefer Ingram to Coples)--I will go with INGRAM here.

8. PHINS Reiff/Coples (Need RT and DE--Claiborne threat. Added Richard Marshall in free agency, but they could use a CB too); REIFF

9. PANTHERS Coples/Claiborne (RR is said to want to upgrade the pass rush; he is also said to devalue CBs a bit--Would he take Claiborne if Coples is on the board?) I think he would take Claiborne because he is BPA and at a need--Gamble cannot play #1 CB forever. CLAIBORNE

I would say there is about a 25% chance he falls to us, then about a 70% we take him if he is there. Just guesses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Give Legette another season?

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Packersfan
      Week 16 NFL games

      By Packersfan · Posted

      Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Chad ‘Ochstradamus’ Johnson and Shannon Sharpe on Panthers

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...