Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marty Hurney Surely Didn't Leak Claiborne's Wonderlic Did He?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

People have speculated that the leaker has to be from a team that's hoping Claiborne falls to them. And now, miraculously, there is lots of speculation today that Claiborne will fall to the Panthers at #9.

Surely Marty Hurney isn't a terrible enough human being to leak the score of someone with a learning disability just in hopes of drafting him, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont care if he dumb as long as he can play ball and stay out of trouble . Really do hope that score will make him fall to us

I agree with everything in this post AS LONG AS nobody from the Panthers organization leaked it. If he falls to us, it would be a positive out of a terrible thing someone else did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a big story for fans but for people like Hurney who know football, they do not care at all. He isn't a QB that needs to process complex systems. He is a CB that on each play pretty much has one job. Whether he can read or take tests will not affect his ability to play CB. If he was a LB or QB, then maybe someone would actually care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has no one realized the logical fallacy of this? It's not like Hurney is the only one with access to his scores. All the GM's can see his scores. The only people that this was "leaked" for is the general public. The people who make the drafting decisions for their teams would have already had this information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has no one realized the logical fallacy of this? It's not like Hurney is the only one with access to his scores. All the GM's can see his scores. The only people that this was "leaked" for is the general public. The people who make the drafting decisions for their teams would have already had this information.

Logic I've read is that it would pressure on GMs to not draft him because of possible fan backlash. Could work on the timid or those without job security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...