Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's Going To Play Olb, Beason Or Kuechly


Matthias

  

101 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will play OLB?

    • Jon Beason
      24
    • Luke Kuechly
      77


Recommended Posts

So, who will it be? I always hated the idea of moving Beason outside. We first experienced this scenario back in 2010, when Fox plugged Connor at the inside. Beason still had a good season, but clearly his production dropped a little bit. After that season, Rivera came in and I believe he even promised Beason the ILB position was his for the long haul. (Somebody correct me if I'm wrong)

Yet now we went and drafted Kuechly. I hate the idea of moving Beason to the outside, but I think I hate it even more to not get the best out of our top 9 overall pick. I believe Kuechly is at his best in the inside, not that he couldn't play on the outside. Yet we've seen Beason play on the outside, and while he wasn't as productive, his productivity only dropped a little. If it came down to me, I would probably place Kuechly on the inside, and move Beason back outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it'll be Kuechly on the inside and Beason on the outside. Kuechly is an incredibly cover LB, which means he needs to be inside to fully unleash that potential. If you put him on the outside, teams won't fear the blitz, until he can show that he can, indeed, blitz from the LB position.

Beason on the outside allows for more versatility. And honestly, I don't know if his drop in production is because Connor wasn't as a good as he was, causing Beason to have to try and do more than he was supposed to. Maybe with a beast like Kuechly playing MLB, Beason knows he has the freedom to prowl around on the outside, while Kuechly gets production in the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends on how Beason is when he returns. If he is 100% from day 1 I could see keeping him inside, but more likely I see him taking some time to get back on his feet. It is clear they think that Kuechly can play outside, so we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was hoping Beason would stay in the middle, but the more I think about it, I believe they will move him outside so Kuechly can become our next Dan Morgan (minus the concussions). Anderson, Kuechly, and Beason is stout! Would love it if T. Davis could move back to safety, but I will save wishful thinking for another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kuechly will probably play outside, As good as his football instincts are, no way is he more capable of running a defense better than Beason.

It's not just about the individual positions, it's about the overall strength of the defense. Having Beason in the middle will make the whole defense better.

We only moved Beason outside because Conner was incapable of playing OLB, which is not the case with Kuechly.

Edit: Also this thread is ripe for a poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...