Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Kearse?


Coheed

Recommended Posts

I keep hearing about him in DT discussions, and seems that a lot of people like him. I live in Northern Virginia, and try to catch as many games as I can, but I never really got a good look at Kearse.

But yeah, was just curious as to his style, what he did/didn't do well. (specifics, I guess. I should have payed more attention when I could have)

Plus, I think he has a badass name.

Frank Kearse just sounds defensive tackle-ish.

I'm really curious about the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I've heard a lot about him being the best on our team. Big boy, man. I really hope he keeps it up and does well, then. Where would you guys say he is in respect to the position itself? Possibly starter worthy one day or backup?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I've heard a lot about him being the best on our team. Big boy, man. I really hope he keeps it up and does well, then. Where would you guys say he is in respect to the position itself? Possibly starter worthy one day or backup?

With Rivera, hopefully we can develop young FAs instead of watching them decline every season until they're cut.

I can't wait to see how Kearse plays next season. Our team is talking about developing him as if he's a first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Kearse, but I like Neblett much better. He's going into his 3rd year, and I truly believe it could be his break out year.

Neblett is a stud and should be our starting 3 technique, if you ask me. His pro day (2010) measurables.

Height: 6000

Weight: 297

Bench Press: 33

Vertical Jump: 30.5"

40 T: 4.93

That is a pretty good athlete.

McClain, a third round pick with similar collegiate stats:

Height: 6015

Weight: 291

Vertical Jump: 28"

40 T: 4.96

I think we have the makings of a pair of stud 3 technique DTs. We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neblett is a stud and should be our starting 3 technique, if you ask me. His pro day (2010) measurables.

Height: 6000

Weight: 297

Bench Press: 33

Vertical Jump: 30.5"

40 T: 4.93

That is a pretty good athlete.

McClain, a third round pick with similar collegiate stats:

Height: 6015

Weight: 291

Vertical Jump: 28"

40 T: 4.96

I think we have the makings of a pair of stud 3 technique DTs. We shall see.

They are more UT's no?

Also Shirley and Kearse are going to be the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are more UT's no?

Also Shirley and Kearse are going to be the future.

I think with an offseason of work to work on strength and technique will do wonders for Shirley, kearse, McClain and fua. But having shirley and kearse in the middle would be great, they already have the size, they look much more intimidating in the middle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with an offseason of work to work on strength and technique will do wonders for Shirley, kearse, McClain and fua. But having shirley and kearse in the middle would be great, they already have the size, they look much more intimidating in the middle

True. Very true. Which is why I'm freaking excited about actually having an Offseason and mini camps and OTA's. This should help them out a ton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An odd little vibe I've noticed here of late: some folks are "all or nothing" to an absolutely extreme level when it comes to Bryce. There are, in fact, things Bryce does well. Likewise, there are areas in which he's improved over his time here. He has, on several occasions now, legitimately helped us win games. On the flipside, there have been failures in other areas as well as coaching that we're not in any way his fault.  And finally , it is also genuinely possible that the team may see him as the future, even if we don't. The craziest part, though? It's actually possible that they're right and we're wrong. All of this is true, and more, yet if you accept any of these premises people go from zero to apesh-t in under three seconds 😳 Anything less than total disavowal of Bryce and / or agreement that he's the worst QB of all time and suddenly you're a "stan". Oy 🙄 The reality though?  Bryce is indeed an NFL quarterback. Not a great one, probably backup level good, and I've seen way worse. Now, if you run that statement through your personal Google translator and it comes back with some version of "I want to throw 50 million a year at Bryce for the next 10 years", that's not really my issue it's yours  I don't wanna make him the franchise quarterback, but it's not my call. Win or lose, the team is going to do what they think is best. And as always, if it disagrees with what I think we should do, I'm gonna hope I'm the one who's wrong. Internet clout means nothing. Watching my favorite team win at my favorite sport meas fun 😁
    • I like Icky but he was the wrong tackle to take. Learning run blocking is much easier than learning pass blocking. Cross was pass pro ready. He was the tackle we should have taken without hesitation. 
    • Never saw this angle of the Tyson fight either lol.   
×
×
  • Create New...