Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN picking us to fail?


KrustyK

Recommended Posts

espn is run by morons.

their pre-season power rankings going into 2008:

1 (1) Patriots

2 (2) Colts

3 (3) Chargers

4 (4) Cowboys

5 (5) Jaguars

6 (6) Giants

7 (7) Steelers

8 (10) Packers

9 (8) Seahawks

10 (9) Browns

11 (12) Vikings

12 (11) Saints

13 (13) Eagles

14 (16) Titans

15 (15) Buccaneers

16 (14) Redskins

17 (17) Cardinals

18 (19) Bills

19 (20) Texans

20 (18) Panthers

21 (22) Ravens

22 (23) Broncos

23 (21) Jets

24 (25) Bengals

25 (24) Bears

26 (28) Rams

27 (26) Raiders

28 (27) 49ers

29 (29) Lions

30 (30) Chiefs

31 (31) Dolphins

32 (32) Falcons

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?week=0&season=2008

realistic? the only realistic thing is that they are idiots.

don't pay any attention to them except as a generator of bulletin board material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im curious as to how anyone would pick us not to at least be in the playoffs, after last season, and not really having lost anything except Lucas....

I say, due to our oh so tough schedule, that we go 10-6. I think that it is well within reason we go 12-4 again.

But yeah, I dont know why I really care what those dick noses say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...