Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers' Defense Last Year Versus Play Action


Stroupe-a-loop

Recommended Posts

. . . Was incredibly bad. Like, so, so bad. They get to bring up John Beck going HAM on us, which is not flattering.

http://footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2012/2011-play-action-defense

Hopefully, we improvement and better health along the line and linebacking cores will make us stouter against the run in the first place, and that will keep us from having to overplay it so much on P.A. passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were bad against the run and underneath routes.We could not cover TEs or rbs.Watching nfl rewind we were using a 4 man rush which was not very effective and when they sent a rb or te on a route underneath they were almost always open.Can someone smarter than I break down what was going wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stat is not suprising at all for obvious reasons.

I think our defense will be much better this season but I really doubt it will be top 10, which is fine since with our offense, we don't need it to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stat is not suprising at all for obvious reasons.

I think our defense will be much better this season but I really doubt it will be top 10, which is fine since with our offense, we don't need it to be.

i remember things like this being said last year...except it was doubting that the offense would be a top 10 but the defense didn't make it necessary.

i'm not going to go through the whole list of reasons why i believe the defense will be a top 10 next year, but it's more likely that it will be able to than it was the offense last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am now as much as ever confused why anyone would look at any single aspect of this defensive team from last year and say they were terrible at one thing...then call it news. Our D was terrible except for one or two kinda-bright spots.

Later in the day I'm thinking about breaking the story that the sky is blue and trying to get some play on the blog circuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@rayzor I'm m not saying its impossible to be top 10 but its unlikely. We have some great pieces but our secondary is a huge issue. We have no sure #2 CB and our safety play is way to iffy.

After preseason when we see how things are I can buy into top 10 talk but to say that now is far too premature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@rayzor I'm m not saying its impossible to be top 10 but its unlikely. We have some great pieces but our secondary is a huge issue. We have no sure #2 CB and our safety play is way to iffy.

After preseason when we see how things are I can buy into top 10 talk but to say that now is far too premature.

we have a huge upgrade at coaching in the secondary. Dline should be better. LBs will be a whole lot better. that takes a ton of pressure off the DBs. them having a year in the system will help a lot. there is better competition @ safety.

also, rivera will be more involved.

it will be a lot better all the way around. i'll say it again, the defense has a much better chance of being top 10 next year than the offense had last year. the pieces are all pretty much in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
    • Nah it was Graham. I remember watching it live.
×
×
  • Create New...