Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think our logo is the meanest..


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

now that i see them all in one place, i think we have the most threating looking logo.. i mean really, it looks mean... out of the ones that are supposed to look intimidating, i think we are number 1, but the broncos is definately a close second.

and yes, this is a "im bored at work thread" feel free to post rude, funny, and vulger comments. LOL

1)Panthers

2)Denver

3)Falcons

4)Seehawks

5)eagles

6) jaguars

7) rams

new-nike-carolina-panthers-helmet.jpg

post-3812-0-59599400-1342195934_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the eyes in the Bronco make it look a little fiercer, but you could really interchange the two. I also would move the ram much higher up your list, and switch the Falcottonheadedninnymuggins and Seahawks...(also bored at work)....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

how do people make it in their adult life with such poor grammar? a typo is one thing but multiple misspellings in a 4 sentence post on a site with spell check is just pitiful.

I usually just assume it's a 16 year old that's got nothing to do now that summer has begun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do people make it in their adult life with such poor grammar? a typo is one thing but multiple misspellings in a 4 sentence post on a site with spell check is just pitiful.

Please read my sig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...