Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spartanburg the most brutal training camp site in the NFC South? Probably the whole NFL in my opinion.


Panthersfan704

Recommended Posts

Worst weather camps in NFC South

July, 25, 2012

By Pat Yasinskas | ESPN.com

The Weather Channel has its list of the “worst weather NFL training camps’’ and the NFC South dominates the top 10.

No surprise. It’s the South and it’s summer. It’s going to be hot and you know that going in.

Each of the four cities where NFC South teams train is ranked in the top 10. Tampa is No. 3 (behind only Miami and No. 1 Houston). Metairie, La., camp home for the Saints**, is No. 4. Flowery Branch, Ga., home to the Falcons, is No. 7 and the Carolina Panthers’ camp in Spartanburg, S.C. ranks No. 9.

[+] Enlarge

ncf_a_camnewton_cmg_300.jpgAP Photo/Chuck BurtonCam Newton and the Panthers will try to beat the heat with night workouts during training camp.My only problem with this list is I think it’s out of order. I’m about to set out on my fifth tour of all the NFC South training camps and I spent more than a little camp time in Spartanburg and Tampa before that. I may not be a meteorologist, but my weather instincts and the hats I’ve ruined with sweat tell me that this list needs some flipping.

There is no cool, humidity-free spot in the NFC South, but I’d say Flowery Branch is easily the most tolerable location. You’re on the shores of Lake Lanier and there's a little elevation, so there’s at least the hope of a breeze. Believe it or not, I’d put Tampa as the second most tolerable of the four.

I think people freak out because it’s Florida and the assumption is that the heat is brutal. Yes, it is hot – for six months straight. But I live in Tampa and was more bothered by the heat in Pennsylvania when I visited there earlier this summer. Tampa’s got a little protection because it often rains in the summer and there’s frequently a breeze. It may get up to about 93 or 94 degrees, but it doesn’t usually go much higher and there’s always the hope of a quick storm to cool things off. Plus, the Bucs have cover over most of the seating area for their fans and that helps.

There is no cover in Metairie or Spartanburg. But I’ll go with Metairie as the third most tolerable NFC South destination because, like Tampa, the Gulf of Mexico isn’t far off and cooling storms often come to the rescue.

Spartanburg, at least the Wofford College training complex, is far off from everything – mountains, elevation, shade trees, water, etc. I’ve been out on the Panthers’ practice field on many days where there wasn’t even the hint of a breeze and the humidity was brutal. The air just seems to sit still.

I distinctly remember a day back in the mid-2000s. Spartanburg seemed hotter than ever. Panthers trainer Ryan Vermillion was in charge of watching the heat index and alerting former coach John Fox if it approached a dangerous level. On that particular day, Fox stopped practice less than halfway through for safety reasons. I remember walking off the field with Vermillion and asking him how high the heat index got. He pulled out a gadget that had the numbers “117’’ on it.

That’s why I’m glad Carolina coach Ron Rivera has decided to have almost all evening practices this year.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been at camp in Spartanburg when it was misting rain and still +100 degrees... You're pretty much experiencing what water boarding while standing in a furnace feels like at that point...

Probably the most absolute miserable feeling I have ever had, but well worth the torture...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually rains in the afternoon here in Sptbg. Does feel better after that. Makes night practices easier to enjoy. Does not mean it cannot be stifling hot either. Hope for clouds, and do not forget your cover. I suggest an umbrella. Oh, and water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You might want to re-read that. They're specifically saying they DON'T use stats. They arbitrarily judge each play and then extrapolate that into a grade.
    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
×
×
  • Create New...