Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Much Playing Time Will Clausen Get?

Guest MyDigBick

By Guest MyDigBick,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SIGCHI222 Newbie

SIGCHI222

Posted
Posted

Not sure If we should play him to see if something, by some miracle, happens. Or to let Anderson come in and play so we can find out who will be that last WR.

They better play Jared Green and Lamont Bryant damn it. Tired of seeing Armanti and Tutu.

Ivan, I think they are trying to hide Green and get him on the practice squad. I like him a lot and speed never goes in a slump.

All joking aside I would assume 2nd teamers-1st half, also-rans-2nd half. I'll watch no matter who they put out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DawgzLife Newbie

DawgzLife

Posted
Posted

The answer is 'Too Long'...no matter if it's 2 minutes or the whole game. He sucks.

Why did they decide to keep him instead of developing a young QB who plays a style similar to Cam's?

Clausen has shown all the tools he has & it is a waste to have him in there...he does not allow the coaches to adequately assess the WRs & further, it hurts our OL play & runnoing game, b/c the other team can stack the box. Clausen does not strike fear into any DC.

I really hope he gets cut. Carry only 2 QBs or sign a rook (or even a vet) once final cuts are made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...