Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bad news for Josh Freeman

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

Those of us that are confident about this game are not overlooking anyone. It is just a sense that if the Panthers execute well and take care of themselves (no turnovers, only 4-5 penalties), they should be okay.

Could the Bucs win? Of course they could, but probably only if we beat ourselves with sloppy play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

you are in complete homer mode this week (not that thats a totally bad thing, before you all poo on me)

ive never seen you like this, what did your doctor prescribe?

I think Zod is all giggles after hooking up with Curly blonde on Lake Norman..for a "P H O T O - S H O O T"

Swag it like you mean it Zoddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

the bad news for him is that they have moe larry and curly reffing the game and DBs are getting away with murder.

Personally I don't really believe this.

IMO the Cowgirls always get the benefit of refs, replacement or not.

I bet the Panthers(we are notoriously unlucky) won't have such luck with the refs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Personally I don't really believe this.

IMO the Cowgirls always get the benefit of refs, replacement or not.

I bet the Panthers(we are notoriously unlucky) won't have such luck with the refs.

it's been talked about by players.

i'm thinking that we get away with a few things.

the only team that isn't going to get away with anything is probably going to be the aints.

agreed about the cowboys, tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...