Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Schiano Fox 2.0?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

That thread title may even be a bit of an insult to Fox as Schiano has done nothing noteworthy in NFL. Here's some little tidbits I dug up on him.

Defensive Philosphy:

1. Stop The Run

By this, Schiano means one thing: keep the opposing team under 100 yards rushing, and you're likely to win every game. He notes a statistical correlation, although I'm always wary of those: does keeping rushers under 100 yards cause wins, or does winning cause keeping rushers under 100 yards? Remember that teams stop rushing the ball when they're down big, or down late in games, while they rush more often if they're up late in games to run out the clock. Regardless of the truth, this is the number one point in Schiano's defensive philosophy, and you can expect it to be emphasized with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers as well.

2. Limit Big Plays

Big plays in Schiano's mind are plays of 25 yards or more. Eliminating those plays entirely is not realistic: they're going to happen. Instead, keeping hem down to two per game is the goal. Again, he notes a statistical correlation between limiting those big plays and winning - in this case, it's likely a case of causation as well as correlation.

3. Create Takeaways

His goal: three takeaways per game. He calls them 'takeaways' because 'turnover' is a passive term.

http://www.bucsnatio...sophy-explained

On Offense it looks like he wants mirror what Fox did here with a ground and pound with the occasional shot downfield off of playaction.

"Punting is okay. We have a great punter (Michael Koenen)," he said. "Scoring drives, they may be one series, they may be two series, they may be three series. If you punt the ball and get the ball back in better position, the drive just continues and you put it in the end zone."

http://www.nfl.com/n...aying-keep-away

He also has some Connections to Rivera and Chud fwiw.

Schiano was a defensive assitant and later a Defensive back's coach in Chicago when Rivera was first getting his coaching career started in Chicago in 97-98 as the Bears defensive quality control coach.

He crossed paths with Chud down at the U(Miami) in the 99-2000 season. Chud as most well know was the tight end's coach and Schiano was the Defenisve coordinator that year.

Be quite interesting to see how the 2 different coaches approach this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also sounds like the fundamentals of football

he's just trying to make it sound more cerebral, but it's really nothing different than anyone else focusing on good old fashioned old school football would say.

foxball 2.0 sounds about right. just with more words than run the ball. stop the run. eat my cereal. poop. wipe butt. wash something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats football fundamentals 101.

Schiano doesn't talk it though, he played LB in college and coached Rutgers to the #1 run D, scoring D, and Pass D in the big ten last season.

He knows what he's doing and this game is shaping up to be a classic trap game for the panties. A lot of excuses will be flying around here come monday. My kind of partay!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats football fundamentals 101.

Schiano doesn't talk it though, he played LB in college and coached Rutgers to the #1 run D, scoring D, and Pass D in the big ten last season.

He knows what he's doing and this game is shaping up to be a classic trap game for the panties. A lot of excuses will be flying around here come monday. My kind of partay!

This dude just keeps owning himself. Schiano coached in the Big East. One of the worst football conferences in America you dumb fug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats football fundamentals 101.

Schiano doesn't talk it though, he played LB in college and coached Rutgers to the #1 run D, scoring D, and Pass D in the big ten last season.

He knows what he's doing and this game is shaping up to be a classic trap game for the panties. A lot of excuses will be flying around here come monday. My kind of partay!

Dude, Rutgers is not in the Big 10. Quit making things up. Keep your trolling to facts or opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I now know more about Schiano's boring understanding of football fundamentals than the average Bucs fan. Schiano must have Asperger's syndrome to drone on like that and bore the hell out of anyone within ear shot. I'm glad he's come to terms with the idea that punting is ok, get ready for a lot of it this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...