Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is it always the opposite?


Udogg

Recommended Posts

Seems no matter what we think is the case, whatever unit we consider to be the strong part always starts off slow/bad/etc.

The Defense is keeping us in this game and the offense is stalling consistently. I am not sure why this is always the case with this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would have ever thought, after blowing them out twice toward the end of last season, that they would be the ones headed up and we would be the ones headed down. We are now the worst team in the NFC south. Again.

slow down pimpin. We are not the worst team in the NFC south. We are having a poor offensive game against basically a new team (coach/coordinators/key personnel). Our defense has stepped up since the 1st half. I think the offensive issues can be fixed. Just was saying that usually the side of the ball we worry about is usually the one that surprises us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We spent 45:00 of this game being wayyy to cute with the playcalling. Some regular plays would have faired better than the shotgun quadruple option pistol against a team that is kicking our olines ass.

I agree. When we went straight spread, or straight single/i form we played much better. The pistols, read options were snuffed out all day. Great prep by Tampa coaches, slow changes offensively on our part. They played really well defensively so not much more to say. Plus 93 was in the backfield all game long. Not much we could do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...