Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kuechly


FirstRoundPick

Recommended Posts

What? A LB to eat up blocks? You had the gameplan?

Not trying to be sarcastic, but there was not a safety or anyone else following thru most of those holes, so what would the point of just eating up a block be? LBs are there to stop the runners.

Luke takes in fullback=Beason making tackle which is why Beason led In tackles today. They ran straight college isolation plays all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke takes in fullback=Beason making tackle which is why Beason led In tackles today. They ran straight college isolation plays all day.

I will go back & look at the tape tomorrow beofre I respond, b/c that's not what I saw; I'm not willing to say you are worng or I am right, b/c I had my neices while watching the game...but schemes usually are not designed to loser a LBer on a block so the other can make the tackle. They are designed where LBers can be freed up to run to the ball & make the tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will go back & look at the tape tomorrow beofre I respond, b/c that's not what I saw; I'm not willing to say you are worng or I am right, b/c I had my neices while watching the game...but schemes usually are not designed to loser a LBer on a block so the other can make the tackle. They are designed where LBers can be freed up to run to the ball & make the tackles.

Actually he's right, and if you go back and look at the goal line play, it's exactly what Beason did for Davis when Davis stuffed Martin on the goal line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will go back & look at the tape tomorrow beofre I respond, b/c that's not what I saw; I'm not willing to say you are worng or I am right, b/c I had my neices while watching the game...but schemes usually are not designed to loser a LBer on a block so the other can make the tackle. They are designed where LBers can be freed up to run to the ball & make the tackles.

someone has to take the lead FB out of the equation so someone can then get the RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today was funny because the Bucs played about as perfect as they are capable of and they won 16-10.

Our Offense was dogshit today....if we have any type of balance this game is alot different

I didnt understand why Kuechly was brought off the field so much. The catch Martin made was just a circus play..whatever....1 out of 50 he catches that...he's one of our impact coverage guys and we took him out of the game too much i thought

That's the whole point: We didn't ALLOW you to have balance. That was our game plan, take away the run and make Cam do it all by himself. 10 rushing yds allowed is no error on your part, it was the result of our intent to limit the run...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the whole point: We didn't ALLOW you to have balance. That was our game plan, take away the run and make Cam do it all by himself. 10 rushing yds allowed is no error on your part, it was the result of our intent to limit the run...

Have a cookie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldnt say that, i would say is make sure he can do more than make arm tackles. Seriously this kid doesnt do a good job rushing the passer and doesnt make big hits. But she is a stat stuffer so he looks better than he may be.

I was only joking.

But hindsight 20/20, look at highlights reel Kuechly was just a sure tackler. Not a big hitter or nothing more. He's no Beason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Poster board? Were you trying to use the term poster child?
    • I mean, you're acting like we don't see the tippy-toe bunny hops, jump throws more than normal (with both feet dangling in the air every which a way), and off-platform but off-balance throws that arrive short or sail high. Could that be bad mechanics due to being short? Could a seeming propensity to bail the pocket towards the sidelines early as opposed to sitting in the pocket tall and strong, surveying his reads, be an attempt at trying to see an open throwing lane? I'm not saying that what you're saying isn't a contributing factor to what has been an underwhelming display of executing the QB position, but this is year three, and if the lightbulb hasn't switched on by now---if you haven't figured out that guys are faster, stronger and generally more athletic, then what's it going to take? It's hard to forget that "mental processing" was supposed to be Bryce Young's superpower. Are you telling me that he can't nail down such an easy concept as, "I can't get away with the things I did in college at the pro level," is that right? If he can't get past that, then that surely limits his ability to successfully execute all the other stuff.  Look, I'm not trying to be flippant. I acknowledge that playing pro football is more complex than a lot of fans realize, but all we can do, as fans, is observe. One of my favorite things to do is just look at the greater picture and think what part human nature is playing in the many decisions that are being made or have to be made. You're absolutely correct that fans don't know exactly what's going on, but that is by design, and in many ways it's just the nature of the beast. Some things we can't know. That being said, the professionals screw the hell up all the time. The professionals disagree all the time. These disagreements can be within the same franchise or from franchise to franchise. And sometimes these decisions are all over the place, so excuse me if I ain't exactly buying the I-know-more-than-thee sentiment and that that means that professionals always make better decisions than fans would about certain players. Some of this stuff is simply luck or a crapshoot.
×
×
  • Create New...