Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs Conspiracy


Plewis

Recommended Posts

Alright, so I have absolutely no proof on this at all but I came up with a theory as to why the Bucs were able to destroy us so thoroughly. Yes, they tackled great all day and Josh Freeman was hot early, but it seemed to me that they knew when and where we were trying to go on a lot of plays.

It just so happens that we were training about an hour drive from Tampa all week because of the DNC in Charlotte. Does anyone else think that perhaps the Bucs could have eyes and/or ears on our practices and were able to know our gameplan and/or play calls before the game even started?

I just imagine how easy it would be for a Bucs assistant or whoever to at least put a microphone or small camera near or on our practice field for the week. I only say this because they had our number. It just seemed the playcalling for the Bucs was too perfect. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please take off your tin foil hat.

I don't believe the government can hear my thoughts but I DO believe in aliens sooooo.... you might be a little right about me. Better to be skeptical than a sheep that accepts everything blindly.

Actually, yes. You may be on to something there....good observation.

Thanks, my friends were like "No Way, you're retarded bro" at first then after the game they were like "I don't know man, you might be right."

You're not the only one with this idea...

My bad, I don't check past the front page to see if I'm reusing a topic. Thanks biscuit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew I'd get flamed for this. I'm not saying it's necessarily true, just putting it out there as a possibility. The truth is no one on this board will probably ever know if the Bucs were spying on the Panthers or not and I'm not saying they did.

I'm just saying it's a little bit suspicious that they had us totally out-gameplanned when we have a more talented coaching staff and players (in my opinion.) And it's not like cheating is unheard of in the NFL.

"If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying," isn't that what they say in NASCAR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spy gate 2012!!!!!!!! I knew it

I don't think so every snap they 2 or 3 lineman in our backfield and most of the time coming untouched that alone will blow up any option or fake that's going on. My problem is why we did not counter this pressure with quick slants and drag routes i am still baffled .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...