Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"There is always next week"


Zod

Recommended Posts

Yup. This thread was made out of pure butthurt. People just want to lash out at anybody.

We lost everybody. Get over it.

yeah this and that rivera bitchfest over in the other thread...emo whiners in full blown chicken little mode after one game.

we should have won it. we didn't...but it was just one game, the first game. sure it sucks it was against the bucs. just not a big deal tho. it's early. move forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not the point though. As a coach and as players they absolutely do have to move on to next week; that's not up for debate and it's not what has people steamed. Monday during your presser after the team comes out looking like they really just don't want to be there in a divisional road game is not that time though.

Saying "there's always next week" just reeks of a defeatist attitude. Whether that's his attitude or not none of us can say because we're not with the man in team meetings and we don't get to watch how the team deals with embarrassing themselves on Sunday. The statement obviously doesn't sit right with a lot of people though and no amount of justification is going to fix that. I hope we don't have to hear anything that passive out of him in a presser again for a while.

Are people really ignorant to believe that Rivera is a defeatist kind of guy with a passive attitude??

Seriously?????

I have heard him described as intense, scary, intimidating but not defeatist and passive. I guess that is where taking something in the context of what we already know would apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are people really ignorant to believe that Rivera is a defeatist kind of guy with a passive attitude??

Seriously?????

I have heard him described as intense, scary, intimidating but not defeatist and passive. I guess that is where taking something in the context of what we already know would apply.

apparently you have to be yelling and spitting all the time because that means you mean business. if you don't then you suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only quiet coach to ever been successful is Tony Dungy. And the dude had a guy named Peyton Manning for years.

RR and Leslie Frazier = Poo

RR: "there's next week"

Frazier: "we played well"

Tell me more about how loud and emotional coaches are the only ones to ever succeed. These guys are listening.

nfl_g_gibbs_580.jpg

bill.belichick.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why we take so much from these guys say after games and practice. Mainly because have no idea what they are saying all week long in the locker room with no cameras.

All we have is the clip or soundbite of the week.

the soundbite tells all.

little minded morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me more about how loud and emotional coaches are the only ones to ever succeed. These guys are listening.

nfl_g_gibbs_580.jpg

bill.belichick.jpeg

Those two guys are much much much more emotional than RR and Frazier. You know it too.

RR need to be more emotional. Has to discipline his players and let them be the one who takes the blame for a loss other than going into a press conference and telling the media that there's next week.

This was the coach who in his first year as an HC during camps last year had everything going slow, calm and fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...