Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Read Option


ItsPantone278

Recommended Posts

It will never be the focal point of an offense, but it has more staying power than the wildcat. The main reason it had never caught on in the NFL before because there weren't any QBs capable of running it in the NFL. Most of the truly mobile QBs in college didn't have elite arm talent to cut it in the NFL. And then when you did have guys like that who were mobile and could fling it, they didn't have the size that would let a coach or GM feel comfortable in having a handful of designed QB runs a game. Cam fits both those requirements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucs did a good job of stopping it because they sold out to stop the run, and if we didn't have protection issues, we would've killed them in the air like the Giants did.

One things for sure though, you can't stop it with just your DE's.

You make a point, but I think what killed our read option the most was the fact that our oline just didn't feel like blocking that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why it won't be figured out is because hats have to get on hats. The play is set up to where they can't overload the option side with extra men, because the offense can just check out of the play and hurt you. Then, the blocking is set up to get to the second level as quickly as possible. As long as your OL knows their assignments and make the blocks, the play is there regardless of what the defense does. The only way to contain it is to be more athletic on defense...and, well...look at our fuging backfield. As long as we make the blocks, the play will always be there, by design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've shown you numerous comps for other tackles in the same age and talent range.  His contract, taking into account his age, health, etc.  is the going rate.  It's a fair deal. I've shown you examples of how long it usually takes to find even an average replacement.  Hell, look at every tackle that has ever started for the Panthers.  How many would you consider a success?  They are not easy to find. After everything we've done with this team since drafting Bryce why would we decide to let our best linemen go and add a huge question mark at tackle?   FA is a crapshoot in which any guy available will have cons/issues.  If not, they'll cost a fortune.   Outside of a first or maybe 2nd round pic next year it'll take a few years for a tackle to learn the position at the NFL level.  There are still questions about Icky. Every vet NFL player deals with maintenance.  Between the contract value and history I'm not overly worried about his knee.  I contend his knee issue isn't anything to be overly worried about.  It's not zero risk but it's an acceptable risk.  Every player we draft and every contract we sign has risk.  You're blowing up his own negative words about his knees and ignoring him saying he is healthy and the knee is a non issue.  You have a strong chicken little complex with this team.  Being he has always been a Panther they are very aware of any health issues. We paid now because now is cheaper.  If his knee was really an issue they would have waited.  That tells me it's not the issue you want it to be.    
    • Sauls getting cut by Steelers if no trade happens.
    • No they are going to give Claudin Cherelus 2 spots. 
×
×
  • Create New...