Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Golden Tate's Game Winning Touchdown


Recommended Posts

As former NFL ref Jim Tunney called it last night, the first rule of simultaneous possession is both players must have both hands on the ball. That did not occur until Jennings had secured the ball to his body and was down, therefore, no simultaneous possession.

The fact this was such a blatantly blown call is only the icing on the cake for a final 3 minutes that was riddled with blown/bad/missed calls. Before the interception was even made, watch Tate shove Shields to the ground from behind when the ball is in the air- offensive pass interference. Interception in the end zone with no time left- game over.

This comes after an obvious offensive pass interference earlier in the quarter when Tate had both his hands wrapped around Shields, who had inside position and knocked the ball down on a 3rd and 17 play. Refs called defensive PI and gave Seattle a first down. 4th down, punt to Green Bay, game over.

Then the phantom roughing the passer call when Green Bay made the sideline interception after Wilson was flushed from the pocket being chased by a DB. Wilson was running at an angle toward to sideline and line of scrimmage and the DB dove to tackle him around the calves. Only when a QB is standing in the pocket and a defensive player goes low is it considered roughing (the Tom Brady rule). In this case, the QB was a running back and there should have been a no call. Interception Green Bay- game over.

This call was only blown because it happened to Greenbay. Bet you dollars to donut, if it was the other wat around no one would be making this much fuss.

It does say a lot about social media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frist off...Jennings should have batted the ball away instead of trying to catch it because he was the tallest. Why was he trying to catching a ball when his team was strongly in the lead anyway and when there were clearly two Seahawks players under him who could have easily grabbed the ball. All he did was bring down the ball. He didn't secure the ball. Which meant it was a ball up for grabs.

And since when is an INT an INT when the ball is just touched by the other team? I was under the impression that if the ball wasn't batted away, the offensive team has a right to fight for the ball since the hail mary was thrown to benefit them.

The Refs didn't get it wrong...All those who get their marching orders from the media need to realize how much they are being played.

This is nothing more than what our media seem to enjoy doing..Piling on on those they preceive are weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This call was only blown because it happened to Greenbay. Bet you dollars to donut, if it was the other wat around no one would be making this much fuss.

It does say a lot about social media.

This call was blown because of unbelievably lousy officiating on prime time Monday Night Football. The refs have no clue who was playing; that was proven when they couldn't call penalties on the right team.

You really sound as though you just started watching the game last week, it's pretty embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This call was blown because of unbelievably lousy officiating on prime time Monday Night Football. The refs have no clue who was playing; that was proven when they couldn't call penalties on the right team.

No... the you are being duped.. becau the regular officials would have made the same call. And, you know it. We're only piling on these Refs because some are trying to get over on them...Get the psychology.

The packers lost when Jennings didn't bat the ball away. Plain and simple

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know if were the panthers, at home, and it was steve smith, there wouldn't be a single panther fan say it was an INT.

Saddest thing is, that wasn't even close to being the worse call of that game.

and if it were the panthers, at home, and it was Chris Gamble, you wouldn't be willing to argue it wasn't an interception.

that's not really a good point either way bruh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying it shouldn't be a part of his game it should be present yes. But expecting 500/10 in the rushing category is not sustainable IMO. All it's going to take is a defender to be willing to sacrifice a penalty or a fine to send a message just as the Falcons did with Sam Darnold. And even as big and durable as Cam was defenses eventually started to try to send a message to him too. We have to be realistic about not putting our QB at unnecessary risk. Especially given the fact we aren't even willing to run a QB sneak with him. We've also invested a good bit in our backfield that's what they're there for. And furthermore ultimately whatever QB  tier Bryce Young ends up landing in over the course of his career it is going to be defined by what he does as a passer not his rushing ability. That's all I'm saying.
    • Bryce had 191 yards 55% completion 1 td 1 pick.  That's an amazing performance?   Come on people
    • His footwork has been discussed many times over related to not just within the pocket but the quality of his drop backs and how while his receivers have been an issue his own footwork has created issues with his receivers. It is a mutual give and take dynamic after all. As far as his deep passing goes I will happily admit I saw some very impressive long throws from Bryce later in the season and I said so at the time and I'm still saying so now. That doesn't mean that there still aren't issues and beyond some instances of him flat out missing receivers deep that he knows he needs to get corrected I think there are still some throws to the sideline that defenses are going to test Bryce on early and often and until he can prove he can beat defenses on those throws consistently they will play him the same way. As far as talk of Bryce being top ten and the metrics that define that different people are going to have different answers and I've said before after the conclusion of the 2024 season that I'm going to try to put yardage aside in some cases and just focus on what Bryce is doing both between the 20's moving the ball and how our redzone scoring percentage is looking. The biggest thing I'm looking for this season is scoring points. Not just field goals. Touchdowns. If the offense is moving consistently and reaching the end zone more often than not and not squandering drives and settling for field goals then I am going to be content for the time being. I do not expect miracles this season. I expect development and competiveness on both sides of the ball but particularly the offensive given the investments we've made trending upward. And no blowout losses. I don't think that's an unreasonable ask do you agree? 🫡
×
×
  • Create New...