Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL re-issues bounty suspensions...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

lol so much for all that celebrating by the Saints and fanbase for the suspensions being overturned.

Four weeks and three days after an internal appeals panel vacated suspensions imposed on Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma, Browns linebacker Scott Fujita, Saints defensive end Will Smith, and free-agent defensive end Anthony Hargrove, the league has re-issued the discipline without any changes or reductions, according to a league source.

This means that Vilma will be suspended a full season, Fujita will be suspended three games, Smith will be suspended four games, and Hargrove will be suspended eight games.

All four players have the right to appeal the ruling to Commissioner Roger Goodell. Given that the players chose this time around to meet with Goodell before he issued the suspensions, the players may be more inclined to participate in the appeal process this time around.

Given that the league has relied this time around on lengthy sworn statements from former Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams and former Saints assistant Mike Cerullo, it’s likely that both will testify at the appeal hearing.

Then, after the appeal process has been completed, the players likely will take the league back to court — barring a dramatic reduction or reversal of the punishments by Goodell.

The players also may challenge the rulings once again under the labor deal, if the players believe that the punishment in any way extends beyond Goodell’s jurisdiction over conduct detrimental to the game and encroaches on possible salary-cap violations.

UPDATE 3:37 p.m. ET: The NFL says that an explanation of the re-issued bounty discipline is coming soon. Asked for confirmation that the same discipline has been meted out, the league said, “It’s not that simple.” As to specific question as to whether the penalties will be the same, the NFL said, “Not all.”

http://profootballta...nty-discipline/

Brees can go back to being the tool he is saying how unfair this is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the fans of the Panthers, I'd be way more concerned with what's wrong with my team than I would be with the Saints. But that's just me. It seems some of you rather sit and hope for the failure of otherteams than fix your own team's mess.

Are you mentally handicapped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the fans of the Panthers, I'd be way more concerned with what's wrong with my team than I would be with the Saints. But that's just me. It seems some of you rather sit and hope for the failure of otherteams than fix your own team's mess.

Who is your team anyhow? You have almost 3,000 posts here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the fans of the Panthers, I'd be way more concerned with what's wrong with my team than I would be with the Saints. But that's just me. It seems some of you rather sit and hope for the failure of otherteams than fix your own team's mess.

You have made it pretty clear that you only have one thing on your mind, but some people actually can comprehend more than one single thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the fans of the Panthers, I'd be way more concerned with what's wrong with my team than I would be with the Saints. But that's just me. It seems some of you rather sit and hope for the failure of otherteams than fix your own team's mess.

so NFL central should have zero posts and zero threads then.

because we should be "way more concerned with what's wrong with our team"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A local Charlotte TV station said that the NFL referenced a 2010 game against the Panthers. This game, Nov. 7th:

http://www.panthers....b3-9c715eb056aa

http://www.panthers....e4-b256188cb422

http://www.panthers....f1-fe7f2fc53331

Full NFL release here:

http://www.nfl.com/n..._headline_stack

"The facts, however, conclusively undermine this characterization. For example, in a game between the Saints and the New York Giants in 2009, a Saints player earned a reward for a cart-off of Giants running back Brandon Jacobs, who left the game with a shoulder injury. After a 2010 game against the Carolina Panthers, the Saints defensive unit was commended for forcing '3 CART-OFFS! 1 already placed on I.R.!' In that game, three Carolina players were seriously injured: running backs Jonathan Stewart and Tyrell Sutton, who were literally carted off the field with a head/neck and ankle injury, respectively, and quarterback Matt Moore, who was later placed on injured reserve, unable to return for the remainder of the season, with a torn labrum. These all satisfied Coach Williams' definition of cart-offs: 'big hits that resulted in an opposing player leaving the game due to the hit (for example, having the "wind knocked out of him" or being shaken up or injured in some other way)...' He added that 'rewarding cart-offs and knockouts...could encourage players to injure opposing players [and] I now understand that someone could be seriously injured as a result...'

They are getting what they deserve. Period. Vilma especially is slime. No sympathy here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the fans of the Panthers, I'd be way more concerned with what's wrong with my team than I would be with the Saints. But that's just me. It seems some of you rather sit and hope for the failure of otherteams than fix your own team's mess.

I sit and hope for the Panthers to right the ship. I sit and laugh at a division rival getting slammed by Goddell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...