Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heaven is real, says neurosurgeon who claims to have visited the afterlife


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

Dr. Eben Alexander has taught at Harvard Medical School and has earned a strong reputation as a neurosurgeon. And while Alexander says he's long called himself a Christian, he never held deeply religious beliefs or a pronounced faith in the afterlife.

But after a week in a coma during the fall of 2008, during which his neocortex ceased to function, Alexander claims he experienced a life-changing visit to the afterlife, specifically heaven.

"According to current medical understanding of the brain and mind, there is absolutely no way that I could have experienced even a dim and limited consciousness during my time in the coma, much less the hyper-vivid and completely coherent odyssey I underwent," Alexander writes in the cover story of this week's edition of Newsweek.

So what exactly does heaven look like?

Alexander says he first found himself floating above clouds before witnessing, "transparent, shimmering beings arced across the sky, leaving long, streamer like lines behind them."

He claims to have been escorted by an unknown female companion and says he communicated with these beings through a method of correspondence that transcended language. Alexander says the messages he received from those beings loosely translated as:

"You are loved and cherished, dearly, forever."

"You have nothing to fear."

"There is nothing you can do wrong."

The video in the link is pretty cool

I found this very comforting for some reason, I consider myself a christian but not super religious

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/heaven-real-says-neurosurgeon-claims-visited-afterlife-213527063.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this in the tinderbox:

Your neocortex cannot "cease to function"...you can slow down metabolic activity to a bare minimum but what he claims basically says you can live without axon activity.

Now he's trying to market a book claiming he's been to heaven.

What he is calling heaven is no different than someone saying there is base consciousness. He's skewing anecdotal perspective with scientific data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this in the tinderbox:

Your neocortex cannot "cease to function"...you can slow down metabolic activity to a bare minimum but what he claims basically says you can live without axon activity.

Now he's trying to market a book claiming he's been to heaven.

What he is calling heaven is no different than someone saying there is base consciousness. He's skewing anecdotal perspective with scientific data.

Your probably right, what does a neurosurgeon from Harvard know....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your probably right, what does a neurosurgeon from Harvard know....

you clearly don't understand my post

anecdotal perspective v. scientific data due to a forced deficiency in axon activity

If you went under what he did, you could have experienced living between Brooklyn Deckers tits...its showing consciousness exists outside the object receiver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you clearly don't understand my post

anecdotal perspective v. scientific data due to a forced deficiency in axon activity

If you went under what he did, you could have experienced living between Brooklyn Deckers tits...its showing consciousness exists outside the object receiver

Wait wait wait, how can I experience living bw Brooklyn Deckers tits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait wait wait, how can I experience living bw Brooklyn Deckers tits?

Ok, so if we continue to explore and figure more about the brain, we could in theory be able to identify the specific generator of consciousness (i.e. what some people believe to be the pineal gland or more mainstream scientists will say is within the neocortex). I personally believe this could happen within 20 years.

In this regard, we could be able down the road to implant subcortical structures that will generate specific conscious activity...such as the idea of living infinitely between Brooklyn Decker's tits in a metaphysical realm

Its all a natural matrix

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe humans and all living things consist of 2 things, physical body and consciousness. Physical body will parish but consciousness will live forever. Do you ever feel like your consciousness and your physical body are two different entities? Do you ever feel like you can leave your physical body? Many people do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not convinced. Until I hear an lifelong atheist say they saw heaven I'm not convinced. I don't care if he's not very religious, he's still Christian and has an idea of heaven. So it's not in the least bit suprising that he had a vision of it. If I was hit by a bus and had visions of angels and pearly gates, then I would have to rethink my atheism. If on the other hand I had a vision of being at a Comic Con attended solely by Hooter's Girls, I wouldn't think that place was REAL, I'd just it was like any other dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...