Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should the team consider trading beason


Guest Irv

Recommended Posts

Mr. Touchdown last year: Makes Snide remark that makes him feel superior.

Mr. Touchdown this year: Makes Snide remark that makes him feel superior and increases his E-penis.

Ivan last year: lives in El Salvador

Ivan this year: lives in El Salvador

Do they make you choose between running water or an Internet connection?

What I said was true dude. The same can be said about Chudzinski.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as someone has already said, Beason has been in the right spots, he has just been tackling poorly.

with that being said, it is not just Beason that has had trouble tackling and I think everyone would agree with that... I know there are a set number of practices where full contact is permitted, but I can't help but wonder how this defense would be if it weren't for the new practice rules and the lack of real tackling going on in practice.

if it were allowed, would any of you volunteer as a tackling dummy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than Hurney, what GM in their right mind would trade for an over payed LB with an achilles injury that has yet to demonstrate they are even close to returning to their former level of performance?

Most on here would be screaming bloody murder if the Panthers made a deal to bring in another team's player under similar circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to entertain offers for him, but I honestly don't think how any trades in which we don't lose our ass are offered, considering the circumstances.

Long term, a healthy Beason is a great player to have on the team, even if he's not in the middle. Unless we can pull a 2nd for him, you keep him and let him heal up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been as firmly on the Kuechly should start bandwagon as anyone else but it would be foolish to attempt to ditch Beason entirely until we have a pretty sizable body of work from Kuechly. Even if he starts at Mike for the rest of the year and looks good dumping Beason, who has been a VERY good LB for us and is probably playing badly this year because he's still injured / not recovered entirely, wouldn't make sense to me yet.

Especially when we consider that Thomas Davis' knee is cobbled together and could go again any time. I want TD to be back full strength and play the rest of a long career but that knee can't be trusted yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People want to talk about what we would get for him, but no one has addressed the question of how we would handle the cap hit.

As soon as we move him off our roster (assuming we are talking about doing this now before the deadline) we take a $12 million dollar hit to our cap. Somebody tell me how you propose doing that.

Unless you can answer that question, any discussion of what we could get for him is pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People want to talk about what we would get for him, but no one has addressed the question of how we would handle the cap hit.

As soon as we move him off our roster (assuming we are talking about doing this now before the deadline) we take a $12 million dollar hit to our cap. Somebody tell me how you propose doing that.

Unless you can answer that question, any discussion of what we could get for him is pointless.

The cap hit would actually be about 6.5 million. You would subtract his current cap hit from the accelerated signing bonus cap hit. This number is easily manageable if the team wanted to make the trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...