Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gamble out; Beason doubtful vs. Dallas


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

yippee

Its the Luke, Josh and Captain show with special bash bros. appearances by James Anderson and MR. (to you) Thomas Davis.

With Beason out we will have one additional tackler on the field when on D so... that's something at least

Keiser. its breakout week for you big guy.

Oh, and I expect a pick each from the safeties. Nakamura don't worry. Yours will likely be thrown right at you so don't put too much pressure on yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next week we are going to hear a lot about how Romo has bounced back from his recent struggles.

I'm trying to think back in Panther history and imagine a time we played Romo and didn't make him look like the greatest QB to ever play the game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this were before the first game of the year, I would have been seriously disappointed and pissed. Now, I'm like "meh".

It is amazing how this team can just suck all the emotion out of you. Can't help but wonder if any of the Panthers feel the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember how a certain team from the QC was suppose to run rough shot over a team from the southwest back in 2008 in the playoffs....we all know how that turned out. Luke will play the Mike, and yeah our secondary could suck, but don't play the game before sunday. If we were facing Aaron Rodgers I wouldn't give us any hope, but Romo (and Garrett)..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to think back in Panther history and imagine a time we played Romo and didn't make him look like the greatest QB to ever play the game...

Yeah, I think I saw this week that he is 5-0 lifetime against the Panthers. He's a loser by nature, so we're bound to get him eventually...might as well be Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...