Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Someone explain something to me...


Zod

Recommended Posts

neg rep to smack was an awesome method for self-policing this forum.

a lot of the users here pine for the good old days but a lot of what made that possible was the fact that hit and run trolls and people with ten posts making their awesome threads about bringing back john fox were quickly relieved of their ability to post on the main board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tom Cat

What is it about a losing record that brings out the biggest group of dumbasses out of the woodwork who feel like they have an interesting opinion to share which usually turns out to be a bag of poo waiting to be lit on fire on the Huddle doorstep?

Its called Stockholm Syndrome - huddlers held hostage by a laughable team begin to identify themselves proportionately with the level of play on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody explain to me....

Why mod's complain about dumbass trolls when they have the power to ban them and or delete their thread???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it about a losing record that brings out the biggest group of dumbasses out of the woodwork who feel like they have an interesting opinion to share which usually turns out to be a bag of poo waiting to be lit on fire on the Huddle doorstep?

The only thing that would make this thread better is if people started outing posters by SN and linking the thread that backs the accusation.

goody goody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it about a losing record that brings out the biggest group of dumbasses out of the woodwork who feel like they have an interesting opinion to share which usually turns out to be a bag of poo waiting to be lit on fire on the Huddle doorstep?

Because men compete and they have to find something that they are "winning" at. . . sadly for many that is some bullchit notion that they came up with. Now that facts indirectly support their claim, WOOoOOOoooo they gotta tell the world how "winning" they are.

Its incredible that people lives stoop so low that their confidence needs things like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he is BPA, then yes. I am a believer in Dan at this point and hope that he doubles on his strat from last draft.  T-Mac wasnt the biggest need, but at a first round position, over-drafting for need is bad.  We had XL coming back (we didnt know he'd catch rabid Racoon Disease in the offseason and forget how to be even an acceptable WR), Thielen coming back (yes...old AF thielen was a 1k reciever) and Coker coming off a surprising season...if you asked RIGHT AT THIS SAME POINT LAST OFFSEASON if we should draft Defense or T-Mac where we were last year, I guarantee 70-80% would have said "WHY THE fug ARE WE TAKING A RECIEVER!?!?!".  We're getting close, but you build a winning roster by Drafting studs in the first round and depth after, and Studs dont come from "Well we needed a Long Snapper", they come from "I dont care if we don't need a Receiver, That dude is THE DUDE"
    • I honestly don't care about NBA talent. Our last championship team was light on it. The team that went to the title game was light on it. I wanna win college games. I haven't watched a full NBA game in probably 15 years. I barely remember one and doners, whether their ours or elsewhere. It's one of the reasons why my hatred of duke has cooled. Their players don't hang around long enough for me to even know their names.
    • Should hopefully pick up a half-game on the Sixers and Heat tonight. Also possibly the Hawks and Magic. 🐝🐝🐝
×
×
  • Create New...