Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

panthers have until tuesday to activate gettis


Recommended Posts

i swear the deadline has changed a half dozen times, but per the interim GM...

Steve Reed@SteveReedAP

Panthers haven't decided whether to elevate WR David Gettis to the 53-man roster. They have until Tuesday, per interim GM Brandon Beane.

barring some ridiculous injury to lafell or smith between now and then, if it hasn't happened by now it ain't gonna happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will never understand why Armanti is still on this team, it's getting pathetic. And yet, you still have some people defending him, while the some of the same people want Cam gone.

What a fuges up and stupid ass hick fanbase we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will never understand why Armanti is still on this team, it's getting pathetic. And yet, you still have some people defending him, while the some of the same people want Cam gone.

What a fuges up and stupid ass hick fanbase we have.

I'd rather see Clausen go first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Murphy and Armanti ARE having an impact?...Gettis can't be less impactfull than those two...

Yeah he can. Gettis had bright spots 2 years ago. Murphy showed flashes in 2009 and 2010 and hasn't been impactfull. Gettis maybe a fan favorite, but he really hasn't earned in the love yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least Reed is giving us some tidbits on this potentially impact situation (with our only other legitimate threat at WR being in danger of missing time, and a potential big play threat rejoining the squad to potentially help that loss). Person is a joke.

The CO has articles about how two bad teams squaring off could be a good matchup, about London Fletcher being a defensive iron man, about Meadlock's unique situation, and about trades that didn't happen. Fug yes CO!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah he can. Gettis had bright spots 2 years ago. Murphy showed flashes in 2009 and 2010 and hasn't been impactfull. Gettis maybe a fan favorite, but he really hasn't earned in the love yet.

LOL...have you seen Murphy play this season!? I'm sure Gettis can drop 8 out of 10 passes thrown his way. And Armanti has had 1 reception....I'll repeat it again...Gettis can't be worse. He might not be better, but he sure as HELL cant be worse than non existent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...