Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers win - great, but........


Davis83

Recommended Posts

Still lots of room for improvement - especially in the consistency department.

The D played very well today - the front 4 are becoming a good unit that gets after the QB and the LBers are flying to the ball.

now I'm as happy as everyone else, but the O still has some work to do and the punter needs to be "evaluated" severely.

The running game still lacks consistency - playcalling?, formations? and blocking?

The short passing game still needs work and we still do not have a legitimate #2 WR threat - or maybe the playcalling just does not "see" a #2 on the field?

Coaching a bit better today - the TO's got used at the right times, but I still question some coaching calls on 3rd short, late in the 4th and field position decisions.

so. yes a win - but nothing to tap dance about. Lots of improvement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm happy about the win to, but man, this offense just frustrates me. For one, we have two great backs, but no one is blocking well enough for them to truly do anything. Not only that, but everytime we had a good run, we immediately pass again out of the shotgun. We have the kind of talent that can win the rest of our games this season, but man do I want to see a new staff next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still lots of room for improvement - especially in the consistency department.

The D played very well today - the front 4 are becoming a good unit that gets after the QB and the LBers are flying to the ball.

now I'm as happy as everyone else, but the O still has some work to do and the punter needs to be "evaluated" severely.

The running game still lacks consistency - playcalling?, formations? and blocking?

Shut the fug up you fugging loser. What they didn't give you your drama by losing this week? You are pathetic trash

The short passing game still needs work and we still do not have a legitimate #2 WR threat - or maybe the playcalling just does not "see" a #2 on the field?

Coaching a bit better today - the TO's got used at the right times, but I still question some coaching calls on 3rd short, late in the 4th and field position decisions.

so. yes a win - but nothing to tap dance about. Lots of improvement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dwill and JStew set the record (2 backs with 1100 yds in a season) with a lead blocker. I think they had 399 yds against Tampa in a Mon night game (2008). Want to see Chud put Tolbert in the backfield with them. Please. Someone send him this post.

Tolbert is not a lead blocking FB like Hoover.....

Tolbert is more RB than FB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Using college stats to prove someone is a better pro!?!??! Cmon! We all want Tmac to succeed, but at this point his Pro stats are 0.0.0
    • Clark played 2 seasons in college and had a grand total of 1,340 yards with 6 TDs. T-Mac had 1,402 and 10 as a Sophomore and 1,319 and 8 as a Junior in one less game since they didn't make a bowl (not to mention his 702 and 8 as a Freshman). In 9 years, Chark had 4,440 yards in his 7 seasons in the NFL and 2 years of college playing time, T-Mac had 3,423 yards in his 3 seasons in college alone. Chark's only 1,000 yard NFL season (which was only 1,008 yards to begin with, and only 3 games over 79 yards that year) came in an offense where the only other non RB's in the offense to have more than 35 targets were Chris Conely (90 targets for 775 yards) and Dede Westbrook (101 targets for 660 yards).  His 2nd best season, his competition for targets was Keelan Cole Sr (88 targets for 642 yards), Laviska (79 targets for 600) and Conley again (63 targets for 471). Beyond his 1k season, he had seasons of 706, 525, 502, 174, 154, and 31 yards, despite being the #1 WR on his team for 3 of his 4 seasons that he had over 174 yards. Any 1st round WR should already be considered a better WR than that, let alone one taken in the Top 10 and has the college statistics that T-Mac had.  Had we traded back and taken Egbuka or Golden, I'd still be saying the same thing about them vs Chark, this has nothing to do with my personal love of T-Mac. 
    • I'm not sure his idea of us being 28th at the start of the season isn't wrong. It's hard to project who we are based off the fact all the rookies we are depending on to contribute but know nothing about. we don't know what derrick brown looks like week 1.. hunter renfrow t-mac,legette, and our tight ends. we are going to have two new starting safeties no matter what. I think it's hard to know just which way the dial can swing on this roster.
×
×
  • Create New...