Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what's more rare than a carolina win?


Recommended Posts

True

in a dream world yes, maybe

in the real world it is impossible to spend the same amount

in the real world spending money does not automatically equal success on the field

our line does not look that much worse than it did last season if you take into account the best center in the game is on IR. Everyone across the board is performing below board. An all-pro O-line does not make a huge difference this year.. We are focusing on all the sacks we take when we are trying to come from behind and every defense has their ears pinned back. Better Oline will only help a little in that situation and definitely not enough to make a difference.

we are predictable, inefficient, poorly motivated, and without any semblance of an offensive leader. What's more is that our limitations on both sides of the ball are glaring and our tendencies to overcome them are transparent.

We don't dictate anything and we play a very reactive type of game.

Until MAJOR changes are made ranging from as obvious as a new OG or two to a fundamental change and absolute commitment to our philosophical approach to the game, we are gonna bounce between league doormat to almost relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in a dream world yes, maybe

in the real world it is impossible to spend the same amount

in the real world spending money does not automatically equal success on the field

our line does not look that much worse than it did last season if you take into account the best center in the game is on IR. Everyone across the board is performing below board. An all-pro O-line does not make a huge difference this year.. We are focusing on all the sacks we take when we are trying to come from behind and every defense has their ears pinned back. Better Oline will only help a little in that situation and definitely not enough to make a difference.

we are predictable, inefficient, poorly motivated, and without any semblance of an offensive leader. What's more is that our limitations on both sides of the ball are glaring and our tendencies to overcome them are transparent.

We don't dictate anything and we play a very reactive type of game.

Until MAJOR changes are made ranging from as obvious as a new OG or two to a fundamental change and absolute commitment to our philosophical approach to the game, we are gonna bounce between league doormat to almost relevant.

Playing from behind? You haven't watched many games have you? Our problem is that we ****** defeat from the jaws of victory, not that we get manhandled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing from behind? You haven't watched many games have you? Our problem is that we ****** defeat from the jaws of victory, not that we get manhandled.

that is all you got from that post? wow

Yes, from behind. As in, in the final minute. Behind, where we are when the game ends. Behind, where we are as soon as the other team watches what our game plan is and figures out how to stop it cold and for good. Behind, where we are in practically every offensive category and statistical category that matters.

I really did not think I would have to explain that one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
    • Jaelan Phillips, Devin Lloyd and the rest of the Carolina Panthers’ new recruits will begin work at Bank of America Stadium on April 20.   The first phase of the offseason program will launch later this month, the team announced Friday. Organized team activities (OTAs) will begin on May 26, with six workouts spread out through June 4. Those workouts are considered voluntary. Mandatory minicamp will run June 9 to June 11.   Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article315275598.html#storylink=cpy
×
×
  • Create New...