Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The only way Rivera can save his job.


hepcat

Recommended Posts

What would it take for you to say Rivera has earned the shot to coach the team next year?

For me, he has to finish the season better than last year's 6-10 record. 7-9 or 8-8.

Although it's been a rough season, the schedule finally lets up and there's an opportunity to pile on 3 wins against the bottom feeders in the AFC West, given they take care of business against KC, Oakland, and San Diego (games the Panthers have no business losing). Brings them to 6 wins. So they'd need to beat either Atlanta at home or New Orleans on the road to have a chance at 7 wins. A late season divisional win against a playoff caliber team like Atlanta or New Orleans...does it put Rivera in the conversation to stay next year?

Looking at the remaining schedule, it really makes the Atlanta, Chicago, and Tampa (2nd time) losses sting even more. Panthers could be staring down a 10-6 record right now if they pull those games out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finishing hot at the end after the team is out of contention is what he did last year. We also had a front loaded schedule then too. A good finish to get to 7-9 still might not do it for me. If he gets to 8-8 somehow then it's a more legit discussion. I just don't want to create a false hope by beating bad teams down the stretch like we did in 2011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew this freakin Charger mindset would infect this team.

Every year for as long as I can remember the Chargers do "just enough" to make the ownership think "well, maybe" so that there isn't any necessary turnover.

Rivera made the same stupid mistakes last night as he did in losses. Don't fall for the trap. The tease of a few pretty games. Move on before that horrible franchises mindset infects us further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. He's cost us too many games with poor clock management, leaving free potential points on the board (think last nights game before the half, also think of the chicago game), and not having the right defensive call/personnel on the field in critical situations. I think he'd be fine as a DC, but he flat out sucks at basic game management decision that you can learn from playing madden.

Also he's the headcoach, and has done N O T H I N G to tell Chud to fix his damn scheme. IDC what deal they had worked out before they got here, this is ultimately Rivera's fault for not threatening/ending Chud's job here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...