Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legit question. Mark Sanchez or Jimmy Clausen?

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

Mark Sanchez...really? You got to be kidding. What? You think Derek Anderson is going elsewhere?

As for the third string (which I don't think Sanchez wants to be), I would take my chances with Pickles. He has been here, has had a chance to learn, has developed some type of chemistry with the team (for what it's worth), and doesn't have the failed body of work that Sanchez has (which means that we can at least dream and/or be delusional about him getting the job done if need be).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mark Sanchez...really? You got to be kidding. What? You think Derek Anderson is going elsewhere?

As for the third string (which I don't think Sanchez wants to be), I would take my chances with Pickles. He has been here, has had a chance to learn, has developed some type of chemistry with the team (for what it's worth), and doesn't have the failed body of work that Sanchez has (which means that we can at least dream and/or be delusional about him getting the job done if need be).

No, sir. It was more of IF you HAD to pick one. For fun sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Totally.  I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point.  I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been.  Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game.  Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses.   Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs.  Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards.  That's what you don't want to be stuck in.  Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him.    
    • kungfoodude
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all.
    • Mr. Scot
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
×
×
  • Create New...