Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade up for Star Lotulelei?


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

As much as I'd like to pick either Star or Joeckel, the fact remains we won our way out of contention for either, which is fine by me.

I'm too gun-shy of trading up anymore, thanks to Hurney Magic. No, stick with what we have... who we do draft may just end up surprising us all in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan Jenkins is just as good as Star and with some NFL conditioning will be just as fast. He plays lower and shows better hands to shake blockers. He has played in major conference against major comp all four years.

He's a guy I like a lot but I Dno if he's top15 worthy. Even though we need a NT, I like Sheldon Richarson more than the rest of the DTs after Star and Hankins. These MIZZOU guys are starting to impact the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Keep our picks. We know we are without our 3rd and 7th plus either our 5th or 6th we gave up for Murphy.

For about the 20th time, the only picks we don't have this year are our 3rd and whatever we have to give up for Murphy, probably 7th or 6th. Colin Jones was for a 2014 7th. We didn't trade any other picks away. We have every pick except our 3rd and either 7th or 6th (probably 7th if it's performance based).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lotulelei looks to be a top five pick. To trade up to get him, we are looking at multiple picks including a first next year. Yet all in all, you shouldn't trade up unless you have more than seven draft picks in a draft. Teams like the Patriots can trade up because they have a billion picks every year. Yet if you are like us, who barely have 5 picks in the draft, it's a loser mentality to trade away more than you can spare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lotulelei looks to be a top five pick. To trade up to get him, we are looking at multiple picks including a first next year. Yet all in all, you shouldn't trade up unless you have more than seven draft picks in a draft. Teams like the Patriots can trade up because they have a billion picks every year. Yet if you are like us, who barely have 5 picks in the draft, it's a loser mentality to trade away more than you can spare.

It's too unrealistic to trade up for Star says the guy who makes the most unfeasible mock offseasons of all time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a guy I like a lot but I Dno if he's top15 worthy. Even though we need a NT, I like Sheldon Richarson more than the rest of the DTs after Star and Hankins. These MIZZOU guys are starting to impact the game.

Who else besides Aldon smith? Blaine gabbert?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sean Weatherspoon, Jeremy Maclin, Denario Alexander, William Moore, Ziggy Hood, Justin Smith?????????

You didn't even try to think before you commented huh.

Hahaha that was your big list of players? You can pretty much do what you just did with any SEC school.

Not impressed by that list whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha that was your big list of players? You can pretty much do what you just did with any SEC school.

Not impressed by that list whatsoever.

Aldon Smith, Justin Smith, Sean Weatherspoon, and William Moore are some of the better talents at their position just saying.

Chuck is right, Mizzou has produced some pretty good defensive players in recent history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aldon Smith, Justin Smith, Sean Weatherspoon, and William Moore are some of the better talents at their position just saying.

Chuck is right, Mizzou has produced some pretty good defensive players in recent history.

Thank you buddy. Some people wont just admit that theyre wrong.

Mizzou has been producing really good talents recently. They're program has been very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha that was your big list of players? You can pretty much do what you just did with any SEC school.

Not impressed by that list whatsoever.

Never said they were big. I said Mizzou have been a pretty good program as of late sending players into the league. Some members on here tend to believe that with me. Bet you didnt even know these players I listed came out of Mizzou. You cant ever admit your wrong. Im not impressed by your opinion also. Say what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...